I agree. I think this has NOTHING to do with NSTIC. Facebook's "real name" policy is even more farcical than Google's. Log into Facebook and search for Eliot Spitzer. -- bob BOB BLAKLEY Vice President & Distinguished Analyst, Gartner ITP Identity & Privacy bob.blakley@gartner.com | +1 (512) 657-0768 http://www.gartner.com | http://blogs.gartner.com/bob-blakley/ From: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com<mailto:dick.hardt@gmail.com>> Reply-To: Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com<mailto:dick.hardt@gmail.com>> Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:53:54 -0400 To: Mary Hodder <mary@hodder.org<mailto:mary@hodder.org>> Cc: Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@yahoo.com<mailto:phil.hunt@yahoo.com>>, Kaliya Hamlin <kaliya@mac.com<mailto:kaliya@mac.com>>, "community@lists.idcommons.net<mailto:community@lists.idcommons.net>" <community@lists.idcommons.net<mailto:community@lists.idcommons.net>>, "stewards@lists.idcommons.net<mailto:stewards@lists.idcommons.net>" <stewards@lists.idcommons.net<mailto:stewards@lists.idcommons.net>>, "community@kantarainitiative.org<mailto:community@kantarainitiative.org>" <community@kantarainitiative.org<mailto:community@kantarainitiative.org>> Subject: Re: [community] Google+ "real" names and NSTIC And Google + is doing it because they think the NSTIC wants real names, when in fact the government is not saying that at all. I don't this policy has anything to do with NSTIC. I would say it is similar reasons why Facebook has a realname policy. -- Dick ________________________________ This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the person to whom it has been sent, and may contain information that is confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in error, you are not authorized to copy, distribute, or otherwise use this message or its attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Gartner makes no warranty that this e-mail is error or virus free.