Agree with Frank. Identity is a Human Right. A right to exist. The only governing body who can do something about that is the UN but they seem to be busy with other sorts of things and also seem to take a long time over topics.

I would vote for the Right of Identity on the same level as Right of integrity of the body and the Right to speak freely: Constitution. This will spur the legislation for as far as it is needed since it will be reactive to events. 


Best Regards,

Wilfried Rijsemus,
Program Manager Enterprise Communities/Community Strategist
wrijsemus@cordys.com
www.cordys.com
T +31 341 375473 • M +31 6 10 890 572
 
CORDYS – Improving Business Operations 




On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Frank Wray <frankwray@cfl.rr.com> wrote:
I am not sure if I agree completely...  Americans have a history of not trusting government, and as a matter of fact, America was born on the notion of the lack of trust in government.  The media uses that to sell their product.  

But, Identity should not be treated as a government issue, nation issue, but a user-centric issue in an Internet connected world (global).   Each user is the owner of their identity and each user should have the ability to provide the information that they want to provide when they engage in an Internet transaction (sharing information included) and maintain the anonymity when desired.

NSTIC was misrepresented by the mainstream media, but the root of the issue is the name.   We cannot have a Nation-centric identity eco-system in a global Internet.  One of the beauties of the Internet is the lack of borders.  A global initiative where governments,  the private sector and user communities as interested parties build the trust framework and use some or one of the current trust framework initiatives out there.   And I am not suggesting that NSTIC is necessarily nation-centric, but the name leads to that believe.

I also believe that the misrepresentation of the media is actually a good thing.  This will not necessarily "kill" the initiative it will improve it and maybe even "globalize it" as I have suggested.

So, let's keep the conversation going... :)

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Tony Rutkowski

Sent: 01/12/11 08:43 AM

To: Drummond Reed

Subject: [community] an interesting question


 
The treatment of personal IdM in the U.S. is 
shaped in substantial measure by a messaging 
by the media and lobbying community that conveys 
a hostility to government - some of it extreme - 
where the government is always painted in 
negative terms.  It is a perspective almost 
unknown elsewhere in the world.  That 
perspective is reflected in some of the 
NSTIC dialogue last week.  Has the calculus 
changed by recent events? --amr 

____________________________________________________________ 
You received this message as a subscriber on the list: 
     community@lists.idcommons.net 
To be removed from the list, send any message to: 
     community-unsubscribe@lists.idcommons.net 

For all list information and functions, see: 
     http://lists.idcommons.net/lists/info/community

 

 


 

____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
    community@lists.idcommons.net
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
    community-unsubscribe@lists.idcommons.net

For all list information and functions, see:
    http://lists.idcommons.net/lists/info/community