On Aug 1, 2011, at 2:57 PM, ext Tony Rutkowski wrote:
On 8/1/2011 2:13 PM, Kaliya wrote:
It is about freedom of speech and self representation on the network. Expression not "privacy".
Isn't that what Anders Brevik advocated?
No, he advocated killing people who disagreed with his views.
The reality is that a very large number of miscreants use communications networks for exponentially increasing crime, infrastructure attacks, and all kinds of behavior that significantly harms others. They far outnumber the Buddhists in Kansas. Most rational societies will opt for protecting themselves, and those folks in Kansas will have to deal with their neighbors.
We cannot be protected from terrorists by "real names". We can only be protected by a functioning society. A functioning society must use "security" as only one variable in a complicated equation.
Why is accountability only for identity providers. Those using those identities should be accountable as well.
I agree that accountability is important for everyone. - John
--tony
____________________________________________________________ You received this message as a subscriber on the list: community@lists.idcommons.net To be removed from the list, send any message to: community-unsubscribe@lists.idcommons.net
For all list information and functions, see: http://lists.idcommons.net/lists/info/community