1 Aug
2011
1 Aug
'11
2:57 p.m.
Isn't that what Anders Brevik advocated? The reality is that a very large number of miscreants use communications networks for exponentially increasing crime, infrastructure attacks, and all kinds of behavior that significantly harms others. They far outnumber the Buddhists in Kansas. Most rational societies will opt for protecting themselves, and those folks in Kansas will have to deal with their neighbors. Why is accountability only for identity providers. Those using those identities should be accountable as well. --tony On 8/1/2011 2:13 PM, Kaliya wrote:
It is about freedom of speech and self representation on the network. Expression not "privacy".