Re: [DG-AM] DG-AM Digest, Vol 2, Issue 2

From: dg-am-request@kantarainitiative.org Subject: DG-AM Digest, Vol 2, Issue 2 To: dg-am@kantarainitiative.org Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 12:00:03 -0400

Send DG-AM mailing list submissions to dg-am@kantarainitiative.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/dg-am or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to dg-am-request@kantarainitiative.org

You can reach the person managing the list at dg-am-owner@kantarainitiative.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of DG-AM digest..."

Today's Topics:

1. Re: Related on discovery - attribute schema mapping (Salvatore D'Agostino) 2. Re: Related on discovery - attribute schema mapping (Leif Johansson)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1 Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:06:36 -0400 From: "Salvatore D'Agostino" Subject: Re: [DG-AM] Related on discovery - attribute schema mapping To: "'Joni Brennan'" , Message-ID: <047601cc82b7$f9c20590$ed4610b0$@com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Thanks Joni,

I think the group intends to ask this question of itself. I tried to put this out there in the first call, that based on investigation we may find ourselves moving across covered ground in which case the question posed is valid.

That is the reason we creating a parking space on the wiki for any existing schema, so if we are redundant put the evidence here.

And that being said I think we also want to look beyond simply schemas and to trust/source and use in addition to the bi-lateral, multi-lateral and scale issues you rightfully raise.

Best,

Sal

From: dg-am-bounces@kantarainitiative.org [mailto:dg-am-bounces@kantarainitiative.org] On Behalf Of Joni Brennan Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 11:35 AM To: Dg-am@kantarainitiative.org Subject: [DG-AM] Related on discovery - attribute schema mapping

In the spirit of "something called for" I've heard grumblings regarding the desire (need?) for an org to take on comprehensive attribute schema mapping. I see from search that some of this appears to be happening at a bi-lateral level but perhaps not on a larger multi-lateral scale. Do AM-DG people/orgs have thoughts about this and could it be an interesting track to pursue?

Best, =Joni

-- =Joni

Joni Brennan IEEE-ISTO Kantara Initiative | Executive Director voice:+1 732-226-4223 email: joni @ ieee-isto.org gtalk: jonibrennan skype: upon request

Join the conversation on the community@ list - http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/community