Hi all - (sorry for the duplicate post, for those who saw this on another list). If any of you have comments on this draft, please let Sal, Keith, or I know and we will take it to the LC. Thanks! -Heather ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: "Joni Brennan" To: LC@kantarainitiative.org, "dg-nstic" Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2012 3:32:33 PM Subject: [KI-LC] REVIEW DRAFT: Kantara Initiative Position Paper - NSTIC Steering Group Formation v0.2 Hello LC and NSTIC DG, Please find attached the early draft of Kantara Position Paper - NSTIC Steering Group Formation This is a draft - which means - now is the time for you members to submit your comments and edits - both general and specific. I will amalgamate comments received. A few notes. Please send with in one week for inclusion in the next draft. The following Groups please send in your group representative edits / copy as appropriate. If your group does not align or have context then you have no action to take. - AMDG - BCTF - Consumer ID WG - HIAWG - Telco ID WG - Japan WG (I'm not sure that Japan will have input as this is a US strategy but the opportunity is open for this group as well!) - other KI stakeholders not included above (?) UMA WG - Eve I got your comments but would like to know which of the stakeholder groups you see UMA aligning with. Once we see which stakeholder groups Kantara groups are aligning with we will be able to work forward toward final input. Please note that the NSTIC Governance recommendation calls for organizations / individuals to identify with ONE stakeholder group [1]. I believe this is a challenge as many organizations will find overlap. Our approach should be to either - Reach consensus on one stakeholder group to identify with OR - Provide input regarding how the governance should change to allow for organizations / individuals to align with multiple stakeholder groups. Remember this is our opportunity to help shape the NSTIC steering governance model and highlight the significant work that Kantara is already progressing in the space. [1] Recommendation 25: Each Stakeholder should be required to “self-identify” into the stakeholder group which it considers best represents its primary role or interest in the Identity Ecosystem. Self-identification into one stakeholder category at a time would prevent organizations that may play multiple roles in the Identity Ecosystem from exerting undue influence by gaining more than one vote on the Management Council. Importantly, individuals that do not wish to self-identify into one of the other 13 stakeholder groups may choose to participate as an Unaffiliated Individual. I look forward to working with you to publish this paper. =Joni Joni Brennan Kantara Initiative | Executive Director voice:+1 732-226-4223 email: joni @ ieee-isto.org Slideshare - Building Trusted Identity Ecosystems - It takes a village! http://www.slideshare.net/kantarainitiative/kantara-may-2012 _______________________________________________ LC mailing list LC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc