1. The group discussed the group’s purpose. I will be providing some updates prior to next Friday’s meeting to clarify our focus. 
   
   
2. We have had small groups the past few weeks. I encourage you to attend our meetings regularly. If you cannot, please excuse yourself.  We need to know how many active participants we have, as this will impact the group's output scope.

3. The Agenda is below. Our plan for next week is to review the progress we made today and align on next steps for the process, then begin Part One of that process. 
   
   
4. Please feel free to invite anyone whom you believe can add value to our group.  

BDDG Agenda - March 20, 2026

1. ADMIN:

1. Attendance 

2. Approve Meeting Notes: Mar 13 

3. Anything else?

2. APPROVE REVISED GROUP PURPOSE

1. Will circulate prior to the meeting

3. REVIEW LAST WEEK'S MEETING GROUP OUTPUT DISCUSSION

1. Group agreed to a decision tree approach that required significant upfront context setting. 

2. Two-Part Process

1. PART ONE: Create Context via a role-based framework 

1. Similar to the decentralized Triangle of Trust (issuer, verifier, relying party) or the mDL stakeholders (Holder, Issuing Authority, Relying Party, Identity Provider)

2. Define specific use cases: airports, financial transactions, retail workforce

3. Possibly leverage The Prism Project Identity Hierarchy

4. Consider the overall Identity Lifecycle

5. Link roles and use cases to architectural approach 

2. PART TWO: Create a decision tree based on the architectural approach/requirements 

1. High Level Approach

1. On Device exclusively

2. Centralized

3. Hybrid

1. Phone home as required

2. Decisions Tree Elements

1. SW only vs SW + HW

2. Fully SAAS, integrated

3. Single vs multiple tech/solution provider, etc. 

4. Biometric Blast Radius

3. For each node 

1. Best practice recommendations

1. Do’s and Dont’s 

2. Risk Factors

4. BEGIN PART ONE BRAINSTORM