Agenda:
Attending: Eve, Matisse, Thomas, Colin, Andrew, Marco
News: News has hit of an "editable" blockchain technology that Accenture has prototyped. This seems...kind of scammy. They seem to have created a private blockchain. Does it require proof of work? Is it really a blockchain? Why would you want to "accelerate...adoption" of blockchain by removing a key defining feature of actual blockchains? Maybe this makes enterprises feel cool, but tamper-evident ledgers can be done right now without having to involve the "b-word". We pronounce this another b-word: bogus.
Tension/theme analysis: Can a blockchain be considered "a distributed system" in the formal sense? There are a number of resources we could draw on to analyze its characteristics if so: scalability, transparency, etc. See this article. Matisse supports this analysis, as it's the premise of her PhD. thesis!
A neutral way of stating the columns Kathleen has added on the right that our participants are more invested in, for use-case reasons, would be (all, please offer feedback on this):
When is a public blockchain appropriate, vs. a consortium-model blockchain, vs. a private blockchain?
AI: Matisse: Share pointers to papers to let us analyze specific blockchain types for next time.
Next time: Get into both specific blockchain mentions and use case-specific analysis, and try to flesh out the report intro for good and all.
Eve Maler
ForgeRock Office of the CTO | VP Innovation & Emerging Technology
Cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl
ForgeRock Summits and UnSummits are coming to London and Paris!