James;
Further to that, it has been my experience that all of the patients on a study sign the same consent form (with possibly one or two ancillary consents for things like biobanking or pharmacogenetics). Only one copy of the consent, or a pointer to a canonical copy, would need to be on the blockchain. That would make the consent transparent to all. The patient's consent, suitably anonymised, could be recorded on the blockchain with a reference to the canonical consent signed. The final step would be to link the dataset from the research back to the consent under which it operates. That would enable subsequent researchers who seek access to study data to confirm whether the consent allowed what their study required and, if they then obtained access to the data, such that that access was also put on the ledger, this would enable Alice (or her heirs or genome related family) to know how the data was used.
Just some initial thoughts.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.