Thanks Eve, thanks all

Sorry not to have made the meeting. It would have been an even earlier start for Good Friday here in NZ than it already was. One more week to go and then back to easier timezones..:-).

Eve's mention of ISO TC 307 reminds me that next week is all about  Kantara's current liaison with ISO SC27 Working Group 5, Identity Management and Privacy technologies, where I will be presenting our comments on 2 drafts done last month.

One of the benefits of Kantara membership is access to early drafts of these standards and the opportunity to comment, though due to ISO copyright policies, we need to keep that material in a private Board Sub Committee space, rather than Kantara's usual open policy.  

I look forward to your deliberations on the final shape of the Report. I sense an air of expectation from the community, on the authoritativeness of its contents.

Cheers

Colin

Executive Director

Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778

Kantara Initiative Inc.

On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 8:07 PM, Eve Maler <eve.maler@forgerock.com> wrote:

http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/BSC/2017-04+%28April+2017%29+Meetings#id-2017-04(April2017)Meetings-Thursday,April13

Agenda:

• Report work

Attending: Eve, Matisse, Devon, Doug, Marco, Thomas, Susan

At this point, people have had many chances to review most of the Report content; only a few pieces are new (though there are some holes yet to be filled). Most particularly, we need to decide on our Recommendations.

Figure 1 highlights the need for a hashed data management system and an addressing management system, above and beyond native blockchain capabilities. Further, IAM infrastructure is separate. Thomas created this figure to point out the "stack" of needs. John W suggested adding the identities/entities on "either end". This is a key insight.

Eve suggest that we all review the Report's observations, make candidate recommendations, and discuss and begin selecting them by next Thursday. We need to finish our work by the end of April.

Matisse suggests that our recommendations should be about future research. Ethereum is under so many attacks that certain projects keep being pushing out.

Susan notes that there is legislation starting up in 10 or more states. Should we develop guidance around legislation?

Keep in mind Kantara's specific opportunities for recommendations. Kantara could develop a specific liaison relationship with this ISO committee, for example.

We agreed to meet next Thursday, and negotiate any further meetings at that time, with no meetings beyond May 1 in any case!

Eve Maler
ForgeRock Office of the CTO | VP Innovation & Emerging Technology
Cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl

_______________________________________________
DG-BSC mailing list
DG-BSC@kantarainitiative.org
http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/dg-bsc