Thanks, Scott! If I'm being honest with myself, because I've got travel on Wed-Thu and our call tomorrow is so early in the day for me, here's what I can do: - Send Phil W a questionnaire to fill in about Sovrin today (not expecting a response in enough time for meetings this week) - Write a draft of my UMA section by Oct 17 for review in Oct 18's meeting (which Thomas is running) *Eve Maler*ForgeRock Office of the CTO | VP Innovation & Emerging Technology Cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl *ForgeRock Summits* are coming to http://summits.forgerock.com/ *London and Paris!* On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Scott Shorter wrote:

Thanks Eve, and hello to the list from my new work email address. It was due a rebranding, not a change of affiliation.

I’ll aim to update my sections by the end of this week. I can chair the call if there is new content to review.

-

Scott

*From: * on behalf of Eve Maler < eve.maler@forgerock.com> *Date: *Monday, October 10, 2016 at 12:04 PM *To: *"dg-bsc@kantarainitiative.org" *Subject: *[DG-BSC] Please read and respond ASAP if you're mentioned: Meetings and section assignments this week, and how to fill in sections

Both Thomas and I are *unable to attend/run* the meetings this week. We have a couple of options: a) If there is new section content to review, we could seek a chair pro tem (*Scott S?*) for that purpose, or b) if there isn't, we probably shouldn't meet.

The current assignments are as follows. You can find most of them in the Report http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/BSC/Report+from+the+Blockcha... itself. *Can people please speak up TODAY about when they can complete first drafts*, and we'll make a judgment call ASAP about tomorrow's call?

- IPFS: *Thomas* - Certificate Transparency: *Scott S* (already some content there) - CommonAccord: *Jim H* - Protocol-Specific Contract Provisions:

- *Kathleen* for HL7 piece - *Eve* for UMA model text piece

- Legal contracts: *Scott D* - Digital Identity: *Andrew* - UMA: *Eve* - Consent Receipts: *John W* - User-Submitted Terms: *John W* or designee - Case Study: MedRec: *Kathleen* - Case Study: Blood Diamond: *Matisse+Scott S* - Case Study: Sovrin: *Eve*

For case studies, we said we'd use a questionnaire approach something like this:

- Deficits and benefits of how the problem space was/is being solved - Proposed benefits of the new solution space – crystalize this (e.g., fraud, not "user empowerment"?) - Different approaches being taken (e.g., whitelist? blacklist? other?) in the new solution space - Strengths, weaknesses, risks, and open issues being seen in practice - Cross-references to the appropriate other technology, case study, and use case sections - Since our Report process is time-boxed, go into only as much depth as you can in a short period of time

For *use cases*, we already have a template http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/BSC/Use+Case+Template in use; I feel it may benefit from *enhancement* with points from the above.

For *technology/technique sections*, we said we'd like to see this information:

- A definition - A short discussion of strengths and weakness of the current way of doing things - A short comparative discussion of strengths and weakness of the new way of doing things (if the technology/technique is "new") - Pointers to the other technology and technique sections as appropriate (so that we have cross-references among the sections)

*Eve Maler *ForgeRock Office of the CTO | VP Innovation & Emerging Technology Cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl *ForgeRock Summits* are coming to http://summits.forgerock.com/ *London and Paris!*

Thanks Matisse! Hearing no fresh content coming for tomorrow (Tuesday), *let's not meet then*. I'll ask Shannon to remove it from the calendar. But I encourage everyone to try to *submit some content for consideration by Thursday*, and let's take Scott up on his willingness to run the call that day. *Eve Maler*ForgeRock Office of the CTO | VP Innovation & Emerging Technology Cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl *ForgeRock Summits* are coming to http://summits.forgerock.com/ *London and Paris!* On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:57 PM, mat perugini wrote:

Hallo everyone,

I'm in, with the timetable we have agreed.

Best regards

Matisse

Il 10/ott/2016 18:05, "Eve Maler" ha scritto:

...

Both Thomas and I are *unable to attend/run* the meetings this week. We have a couple of options: a) If there is new section content to review, we could seek a chair pro tem (*Scott S?*) for that purpose, or b) if there isn't, we probably shouldn't meet.

The current assignments are as follows. You can find most of them in the Report http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/BSC/Report+from+the+Blockcha... itself. *Can people please speak up TODAY about when they can complete first drafts*, and we'll make a judgment call ASAP about tomorrow's call?

- IPFS: *Thomas* - Certificate Transparency: *Scott S* (already some content there) - CommonAccord: *Jim H* - Protocol-Specific Contract Provisions: - *Kathleen* for HL7 piece - *Eve* for UMA model text piece - Legal contracts: *Scott D* - Digital Identity: *Andrew* - UMA: *Eve* - Consent Receipts: *John W* - User-Submitted Terms: *John W* or designee - Case Study: MedRec: *Kathleen* - Case Study: Blood Diamond: *Matisse+Scott S* - Case Study: Sovrin: *Eve*

For case studies, we said we'd use a questionnaire approach something like this:

- Deficits and benefits of how the problem space was/is being solved - Proposed benefits of the new solution space – crystalize this (e.g., fraud, not "user empowerment"?) - Different approaches being taken (e.g., whitelist? blacklist? other?) in the new solution space - Strengths, weaknesses, risks, and open issues being seen in practice - Cross-references to the appropriate other technology, case study, and use case sections - Since our Report process is time-boxed, go into only as much depth as you can in a short period of time

For *use cases*, we already have a template http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/BSC/Use+Case+Template in use; I feel it may benefit from *enhancement* with points from the above.

For *technology/technique sections*, we said we'd like to see this information:

- A definition - A short discussion of strengths and weakness of the current way of doing things - A short comparative discussion of strengths and weakness of the new way of doing things (if the technology/technique is "new") - Pointers to the other technology and technique sections as appropriate (so that we have cross-references among the sections)

*Eve Maler*ForgeRock Office of the CTO | VP Innovation & Emerging Technology Cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl *ForgeRock Summits* are coming to http://summits.forgerock.com/ *London and Paris!*

_______________________________________________ DG-BSC mailing list DG-BSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/dg-bsc