As we discussed at this week's meeting, ChatGPT could be a useful tool for us to initiate content creation. While I'd never take its responses blindly, I do find that it is an effective research assistant and that I can significantly compress the time required to output quality content.

Here is an example of using ChatGPT to create a framework for discussing the importance of and approaches to ensuring provenance that I literally did in <10 minutes. (Feel free to grab content from this if you like or drop comments in the doc - mostly I'm using this as an example of what we could do with the tool.) 

It would be great if we could get an official position from Kantara about whether ChatGPT or other generative AI-based content is acceptable as the basis for published works. I offer it as an approach, but look to leadership to provide guidance on its acceptability. 

Best,

Joey