Hi Ingo - I'm lurking on the list so have probably missed the context if
the terminology discussion.
Having just experienced a couple of drawn out vocabulary working groups, I
am wondering why IDoT is not attempting to simply adopt a
vocabulary/ontology/list of terms from any of the IoT specific groups.
Then, the focus here could be extensions to deal with the ID aspects...
Andrew.
On Friday, January 31, 2014,
Dear All,
Jeff started with Sensor, Actuator and Processor. I'd like to extend this model a bit. Because I think the processor could be either near to the actuator (e.g. the processor in a house regulates the heating because of sensor data.
This "intelligence" could also be somewhere in the cloud/internet. The processor could be a service on a server somewhere or and app on a smartphone.
So I'd like to add an IoT instance in the network.
A second point are intermediates or gateways (names are to be discussed). Because many solutions have one or more instances between sensor/actuator an the service in the cloud. Here e.g. several sensors are concentrated.
What do you think?
Best,
Ingo
-- *Andrew Hughes *CISM CISSP Independent Consultant *In Turn Information Management Consulting* +1 250.888.9474 1249 Palmer Road, Victoria, BC V8P 2H8 AndrewHughes3000@gmail.com ca.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-hughes/a/58/682/ *Identity Management | IT Governance | Information Security *