Hi all, I updated the paragraph we discussed, hope it's clearer now.


On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Salvatore D'Agostino <sal@idmachines.com> wrote:

 

 

From: Salvatore D'Agostino [mailto:sal@idmachines.com]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 9:45 AM
To: 'j stollman'; 'Andrew Hughes'
Cc: 'dg-idot@kantarainitiative.org'


Subject: RE: [DG-IDoT] Terminology discussion

 

Jeff,

 

These are a limited number of examples, I picked EU, vendor (Matrikon (Honeywell) and Siemens ) and the IEC on purpose so as not to require a lot of viewing and getting some cross sections to the list from time to time.  I am sympathetic  to the big link dump, unfun as you point out, sorry if this came across that way.

 

Andrew, please pass on the protégé link when it makes sense, there is also an attribute description there from Keith Hazelton there.

 

Ingo to your point about sensor, actuator, gateway. There are a few different ways this gets implemented depending on the intelligence in the sensor or gateway  Here are some GE, Cisco and Qualcomm pictures that look at this a higher and lower views (GE and Cisco up a level, Qualcomm showing the circuit board to support this – I attached the related cut sheet <- talked about this with Paul M on the list). Figured we might discuss this today.  Regards Sal

 

 

cid:image005.png@01CF21BA.2A205770

 

From: dg-idot-bounces@kantarainitiative.org [mailto:dg-idot-bounces@kantarainitiative.org] On Behalf Of j stollman
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 1:23 PM
To: Andrew Hughes


Cc: dg-idot@kantarainitiative.org
Subject: Re: [DG-IDoT] Terminology discussion

 

I have a request for the group.

 

I am sure that I am not unique in having very little free time to devote to pro bono activities such as IDoT.  I may be unique in being a particularly slow reader.  When I get a note that provides a bunch of links, I glaze over at the prospect of having been given a large reading assignment.  It would be helpful to me -- and, hopefully, to others, if contributors would provide some brief summary of each link so that we have a basis to prioritize which ones we read and which ones we don't.  I recognize that this adds a burden to the contributor.  But, if I am not alone in my perspective, it may be of overall benefit to the group.

 

Thank you.

 

Jeff

 

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Andrew Hughes <andrewhughes3000@gmail.com> wrote:

OK - I'll get something set up based on what's there - don't wait for me!

 

I'll be using Protege.stanford.edu

 

andrew.


Andrew Hughes CISM CISSP 
Independent Consultant
In Turn Information Management Consulting

+1 250.888.9474
1249 Palmer Road,
Victoria, BC V8P 2H8

AndrewHughes3000@gmail.com 
ca.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-hughes/a/58/682/
Identity Management | IT Governance | Information Security 

 

On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 7:16 AM, <Ingo.Friese@telekom.de> wrote:

Hi Andrew,
Hi Sal,

Andrew, an OWL for the IDoT would be great. Very good idea.

For the beginning we have few terms from existing terminologies (e.g. http://www.iot-a.eu/public/terminology). Thanks Sal!

Here we have a for example a reference to: Sensor, Actuator and Gateway
But at other points all these resources are rather unspecific.
Here we have to find/discuss an appropriate terminology.
On the other hand we do not have to define everything. I see maximum 3 to 5 terms we have to start with.
Then we can describe already a lot of identity concepts around IoT.

Ingo








-----Original Message-----
From: Salvatore D'Agostino [mailto:sal@idmachines.com]
Sent: Montag, 3. Februar 2014 05:15
To: 'Andrew Hughes'; 'Ingo Friese'
Cc: Friese, Ingo; dg-idot@kantarainitiative.org
Subject: RE: [DG-IDoT] Terminology discussion

I think I put a few of these out to the thread.  I appreciate Ingo's
comments in that the identities perspective may not be well covered
nonetheless let's consider;

http://www.iot-a.eu/public/terminology

http://www.industry.siemens.com/topics/global/en/industrial-security/support
/pages/glossary.aspx


http://www.matrikonopc.com/resources/dictionary.aspx

http://www.psialliance.org/AreaControlOverview.html

IEC 61850 on electric substations. for starters of the top of my head, I

will dive in further, I will put these in a resources page on the wiki

and please others on list contribute.

Regards,

Sal
From: Andrew Hughes [mailto:andrewhughes3000@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2014 1:23 PM
To: Ingo Friese
Cc: Salvatore D'Agostino; <Ingo.Friese@telekom.de>;
dg-idot@kantarainitiative.org
Subject: Re: [DG-IDoT] Terminology discussion

These articles are from a quick google search - I only read the abstracts so
cannot comment on content. Just food for thought. 

If these are not of use, please disregard

http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2093193
http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/sites/default/files/swj247_0.pdf
http://semanticweb.com/34702_b34702


On Saturday, February 1, 2014, Andrew Hughes <andrewhughes3000@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Ingo - I agree, and wasn't aware you had done the scan

Does anyone have thoughts about creating an ontology for this and publishing
it for anyone to use?

I want to / need to learn OWL in the next couple months and am willing to
create this in parallel to this group. Parallel so I don't hinder your
progress. This seems to be small enough scope to be manageable. 

Thoughts?
Andrew

On Saturday, February 1, 2014, Ingo Friese <ingo.friese@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
Hi Sal,

I think the terminology is just a pre condition for discussing Identity
concepts. If there are already defined and widely terms...lets use them.
I had a Look in different SDOs but I'havent found really good fitting stuff
here. Do You know a good Source for terminology?

Ingo

> Am 31.01.2014 um 22:59 schrieb "Salvatore D'Agostino"
<sal@idmachines.com>:
>
> +1 Andrew,
>
>
https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/IDoT/Concepts+of+Identity+w
> ithin+the+Internet+of+Things
>
> "The purpose of this paper is to describe identity concepts in the
Internet
> of Things. Identity mechanisms in the Internet of Things are different
from
> those in the classic web.
>
> Furthermore this paper proposes a terminology for Identity management in
the
> Internet of Things. This should help to facilitate discussions and work in
> this area without the need to define basic terms again."
>
> Agree we don't need to propose a terminology.  Trying to wean any
> conversation about terminology out of my existence in fact ;-)
>
> So maybe we can work on the abstract text before we go any further.
>
> I like wading into identifiers as Scott has done.   (I just trimmed a
> sentence and would like to talk more about this section).
>
>
>
>
> From: dg-idot-bounces@kantarainitiative.org
> [mailto:dg-idot-bounces@kantarainitiative.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Hughes
> Sent: Friday, January 31, 2014 3:31 PM
> To: Ingo.Friese@telekom.de
> Cc: dg-idot@kantarainitiative.org
> Subject: Re: [DG-IDoT] Terminology discussion
>
> Hi Ingo - I'm lurking on the list so have probably missed the context if
the
> terminology discussion.
>
> Having just experienced a couple of drawn out vocabulary working groups, I
> am wondering why IDoT is not attempting to simply adopt a
> vocabulary/ontology/list of terms from any of the IoT specific groups.
>
> Then, the focus here could be extensions to deal with the ID aspects...
>
> Andrew.
>
> On Friday, January 31, 2014, <Ingo.Friese@telekom.de> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Jeff started with Sensor, Actuator and Processor. I'd like to extend this
> model a bit. Because I think the processor could be either near to the
> actuator (e.g. the processor in a house regulates the heating because of
> sensor data.
> This "intelligence" could also be somewhere in the cloud/internet. The
> processor could be a service on a server somewhere or and app on a
> smartphone.
> So I'd like to add an IoT instance in the network.
>
> A second point are intermediates or gateways (names are to be discussed).
> Because many solutions have one or more instances between sensor/actuator
an
> the service in the cloud. Here e.g. several sensors are concentrated.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Best,
>                 Ingo
>
>
>
> --
> Andrew Hughes CISM CISSP
> Independent Consultant
> In Turn Information Management Consulting
> +1 250.888.9474
> 1249 Palmer Road,
> Victoria, BC V8P 2H8
> AndrewHughes3000@gmail.com
> ca.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-hughes/a/58/682/
> Identity Management | IT Governance | Information Security
>
> _______________________________________________
> DG-IDoT mailing list
> DG-IDoT@kantarainitiative.org
> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/dg-idot


--
Andrew Hughes CISM CISSP 
Independent Consultant
In Turn Information Management Consulting
+1 250.888.9474
1249 Palmer Road,
Victoria, BC V8P 2H8
AndrewHughes3000@gmail.com 
ca.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-hughes/a/58/682/
Identity Management | IT Governance | Information Security 



--
Andrew Hughes CISM CISSP 
Independent Consultant
In Turn Information Management Consulting
+1 250.888.9474
1249 Palmer Road,
Victoria, BC V8P 2H8
AndrewHughes3000@gmail.com 
ca.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-hughes/a/58/682/
Identity Management | IT Governance | Information Security 

 


_______________________________________________
DG-IDoT mailing list
DG-IDoT@kantarainitiative.org
http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/dg-idot



 

--
Jeff Stollman
stollman.j@gmail.com
1 202.683.8699

 

Truth never triumphs — its opponents just die out.

Science advances one funeral at a time.

                                    Max Planck


_______________________________________________
DG-IDoT mailing list
DG-IDoT@kantarainitiative.org
http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/dg-idot




--
Scott Shorter, Principal Security Engineer, Electrosoft Services Inc.
sshorter@electrosoft-inc.com O: 703-437-9451 x21 M: 240-994-7793