Thanks for the research Ingo. While they are structured differently than the use cases that we started collecting, I think that all of the use cases presented in the first ietf document warrant further discussion. Among other things, the prompt us to determine how we want to structure our own use cases. Those included in the IETF document are much more precise than our more generic concerns. I don't know that one is better than the other. But they don't align with each other very well. Jeff On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 9:20 AM, <Ingo.Friese@telekom.de> wrote:

Hi all,****

** **

I’d like to encourage you to provide further use-cases from your working environment. It would be great to have some more:****

See http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/IDoT/Use+Case+Repositoryfor examples. ****

** **

** **

I found two interesting IETF drafts around Internet of Things. One is about IoT use-cases the other one tries to group issues and problems.****

See http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-greevenbosch-dice-authent-author-revoc... ****

And http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lee-iot-problem-statement/****

** **

** **

Feel free to provide emerging standards or background material here:****

** **

http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/IDoT/Repository+for+emerging... ****

http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/IDoT/Repository+for+backgrou... ****

** **

** **

Best regards,****

** **

Ingo****

** **

_______________________________________________ DG-IDoT mailing list DG-IDoT@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/dg-idot

-- Jeff Stollman stollman.j@gmail.com 1 202.683.8699 Truth never triumphs — its opponents just die out. Science advances one funeral at a time. Max Planck