Sal et al Thinking about this a little more, I wanted to quickly align with you: 1. I was unfortunately not even aware this mailing list existed until you reached out. I can't see who is in this alias right now, but am guessing there may be other people who have not been invited to the meetings or received any of the emailed information so far. Apologies - I did not mean to be exclusive! 2. The reality is that the DG is almost done developing the Risk Universe - our last 'framework development' call is tomorrow. (FYI, the project has forked and we have developed two distinct risk universes: one for 'Digital Identity' and one for 'AI Agents'.) What I'd propose is that (once we incorporate feedback from tomorrow's DG meeting) we invite everyone on the mailing list for an 'deliverable review session'. We can offer a high level orientation towards the risk universe, and then explore the model the team has built out. I would really welcome feedback at that stage - since we have a solid first version you all can react to, it will be less thrashy. And spending an hour at this stage will also be much more time-efficient for you all. Does that make sense as a path forward? -John On Tue, Mar 3, 2026 at 10:28 AM Salvatore D'Agostino <sal@idmachines.com> wrote:
Hi John,
I just wanted to prod you to use the mailing list for WG communication. In our LC Leadership call today it was mentioned that you are meeting, and as a non-voting member I would have expected to get a meeting notice. Please use the DG mailing list to send out this information. Let me know if you need any help in managing the group, posting minutes to the wiki, and synching up confluence. It does get easier and happy to help.
Best, Sal
Secretary LC