Nearly there IMHO Ian.. I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section. I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'. This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do. I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist. Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it. Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May. This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week. Cheers Colin Executive Director Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 Kantara Initiative Inc. <https://kantarainitiative.org/> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire <sarah@engageidentity.com> wrote:
Looks good. Ship it!
Sarah Squire Engage Identity http://engageidentity.com
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com> wrote:
All -
Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards.
i
-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166> @iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc