Hi Ian - my comments:
- is ID Pro the voice of the industry? or the industry practitioners?
- we should say something about bigger picture timelines and some of the big decision points that will eventually occur - like 'incubate' v 'standalone'
- Block and Tackle: reminder that the DG is hosted as a Kantara DG and therefore has the Group Participation Agreement and IPR policy coverage - this is a protection for participants. Kantara does not require any DG participant to be a Kantara member - DGs and WGs are open participation platforms.
- it would be a very good idea to have a parallel chat window that can be saved - if we do get 100+ people there is no way to manage voice and it is likely that we will have to collect chatted input.
- Taking roll call - do we care? If yes, then one technique is to share a google doc and have attendees write in their name. This doc could also be the way to keep running meeting notes.
- I can take meeting notes for the first meeting (at least)
- I don't know if it makes sense to give a 20 second blurb about why Kantara is interested in supporting the ID Pro community
- leadership: please note that the DG will likely identify specific project areas to branch off then report back - for example, details about the body of knowledge
- important note for the DG - the Special Committee will be asking the DG to answer/research some questions - so participants shouldn't be surprised :)
- 4th meeting - might be a good idea to discuss potential sub-project areas
- tools: do we want to try the github commenting method to develop mission/values/principles? or just email list?
andrew.