Response to the Board

Ian Glazer

9 May 2017 9 May '17

12:15 p.m.

All - Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards. i -- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 @iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

Attachments:

attachment.html (text/html — 460 bytes)
IDProBoardResponseMay9.pdf (application/pdf — 146.1 KB)

Show replies by date

Sarah Squire

9 May 9 May

6:07 p.m.

Looks good. Ship it! Sarah Squire Engage Identity http://engageidentity.com On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer wrote:

...

All -

Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards.

i

-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166> @iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

Nearly there IMHO Ian.. I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section. I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'. This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do. I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist. Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it. Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May. This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week. Cheers Colin Executive Director Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 Kantara Initiative Inc. https://kantarainitiative.org/ On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire wrote:

...

Looks good. Ship it!

Sarah Squire Engage Identity http://engageidentity.com

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer wrote:

...
All -

Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards.

i

-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166> @iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

Ken Dagg

10:49 a.m.

Ian, In my opinion this looks good other than for one small point. That point is the use of "we" in the first sentence: "First and foremost, we, on behalf of the entire IDPro community, want to thank Kantara for its generosity and its willingness to believe in this effort." I'm not clear who the "we" refers to. In my opinion it should not refer to the IDProSC as it's my understanding that this is a subcommittee of the Kantara Board that has been charged with acting as a "liaison" from the Board to IDPro. It could refer to the IDProDG as this is the group of participants that, through infrastructure provided by Kantara, has been defining IDPro. However, this group, in my opinion, does not represent the "entire IDPro community as membership in the DG was restricted to only those who signed the original pledge. I'd be happier if you would change the we to "the leadership of IDPro". Part of my reason for bringing this up is that I, as a member of the SC, would not be comfortable signing this letter to the Kantara Board as I see it as a conflict of interest in representing both groups. Thanks, Ken On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:17 AM Colin Wallis wrote:

...

Nearly there IMHO Ian..

I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section.

I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'.

This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do. I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist.

Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it.

Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May.

This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week.

Cheers Colin

Executive Director Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 Kantara Initiative Inc. https://kantarainitiative.org/

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire wrote:

...
Looks good. Ship it!

Sarah Squire Engage Identity http://engageidentity.com

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer wrote:

...
All -

Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards.

i

-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166> @iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

-- Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091 kendaggtbs@gmail.com

Ian Glazer

3:07 p.m.

I have incorporated all comments into the attached version. On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Ken Dagg wrote:

...

Ian,

In my opinion this looks good other than for one small point. That point is the use of "we" in the first sentence: "First and foremost, we, on behalf of the entire IDPro community, want to thank Kantara for its generosity and its willingness to believe in this effort."

I'm not clear who the "we" refers to. In my opinion it should not refer to the IDProSC as it's my understanding that this is a subcommittee of the Kantara Board that has been charged with acting as a "liaison" from the Board to IDPro. It could refer to the IDProDG as this is the group of participants that, through infrastructure provided by Kantara, has been defining IDPro. However, this group, in my opinion, does not represent the "entire IDPro community as membership in the DG was restricted to only those who signed the original pledge. I'd be happier if you would change the we to "the leadership of IDPro".

Part of my reason for bringing this up is that I, as a member of the SC, would not be comfortable signing this letter to the Kantara Board as I see it as a conflict of interest in representing both groups.

Thanks, Ken

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:17 AM Colin Wallis wrote:

...
Nearly there IMHO Ian..

I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section.

I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'.

This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do. I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist.

Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it.

Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May.

This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week.

Cheers Colin

Executive Director Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 <+44%207490%20266778> Kantara Initiative Inc. https://kantarainitiative.org/

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire wrote:

...
Looks good. Ship it!

Sarah Squire Engage Identity http://engageidentity.com

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer wrote:

...
All -

Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards.

i

-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166> @iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

-- Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091 <(613)%20825-2091> kendaggtbs@gmail.com

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 @iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

Andrew Hughes

3:14 p.m.

I'll try to review tonight... On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 5:08 PM Ian Glazer wrote:

...

I have incorporated all comments into the attached version.

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Ken Dagg wrote:

...
Ian,

In my opinion this looks good other than for one small point. That point is the use of "we" in the first sentence: "First and foremost, we, on behalf of the entire IDPro community, want to thank Kantara for its generosity and its willingness to believe in this effort."

I'm not clear who the "we" refers to. In my opinion it should not refer to the IDProSC as it's my understanding that this is a subcommittee of the Kantara Board that has been charged with acting as a "liaison" from the Board to IDPro. It could refer to the IDProDG as this is the group of participants that, through infrastructure provided by Kantara, has been defining IDPro. However, this group, in my opinion, does not represent the "entire IDPro community as membership in the DG was restricted to only those who signed the original pledge. I'd be happier if you would change the we to "the leadership of IDPro".

Part of my reason for bringing this up is that I, as a member of the SC, would not be comfortable signing this letter to the Kantara Board as I see it as a conflict of interest in representing both groups.

Thanks, Ken

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:17 AM Colin Wallis wrote:

...
Nearly there IMHO Ian..

I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section.

I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'.

This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do. I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist.

Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it.

Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May.

This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week.

Cheers Colin

Executive Director Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 <+44%207490%20266778> Kantara Initiative Inc. https://kantarainitiative.org/

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire wrote:

...
Looks good. Ship it!

Sarah Squire Engage Identity http://engageidentity.com

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer wrote:

...
All -

Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards.

i

-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166> @iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

-- Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091 <(613)%20825-2091> kendaggtbs@gmail.com

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 @iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer _______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

-- *Andrew Hughes *CISM CISSP Independent Consultant *In Turn Information Management Consulting* o +1 650.209.7542 m +1 250.888.9474 1249 Palmer Road, Victoria, BC V8P 2H8 AndrewHughes3000@gmail.com ca.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-hughes/a/58/682/ *Identity Management | IT Governance | Information Security *

Megan Cannon

6:29 p.m.

Hello Ian, Thanks so much for this thoughtful document. It looks great to me, and I’m looking forward to the discussion. One minor but important change – On the first page, there are two LL’s in Allan. Also – I am putting together the numbers of the GPA’s and pledges, broken out by dates, and I’ll share with this group once it is complete. Thanks, Megan From: idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org [mailto:idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org] On Behalf Of Ian Glazer Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 11:08 AM To: Ken Dagg Cc: idprosc@kantarainitiative.org Subject: Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board I have incorporated all comments into the attached version. On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Ken Dagg mailto:kendaggtbs@gmail.com> wrote: Ian, In my opinion this looks good other than for one small point. That point is the use of "we" in the first sentence: "First and foremost, we, on behalf of the entire IDPro community, want to thank Kantara for its generosity and its willingness to believe in this effort." I'm not clear who the "we" refers to. In my opinion it should not refer to the IDProSC as it's my understanding that this is a subcommittee of the Kantara Board that has been charged with acting as a "liaison" from the Board to IDPro. It could refer to the IDProDG as this is the group of participants that, through infrastructure provided by Kantara, has been defining IDPro. However, this group, in my opinion, does not represent the "entire IDPro community as membership in the DG was restricted to only those who signed the original pledge. I'd be happier if you would change the we to "the leadership of IDPro". Part of my reason for bringing this up is that I, as a member of the SC, would not be comfortable signing this letter to the Kantara Board as I see it as a conflict of interest in representing both groups. Thanks, Ken On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:17 AM Colin Wallis mailto:colin@kantarainitiative.org> wrote: Nearly there IMHO Ian.. I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section. I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'. This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do. I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist. Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it. Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May. This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week. Cheers Colin Executive Director Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778tel:+44%207490%20266778 Kantara Initiative Inc.https://kantarainitiative.org/ [https://drive.google.com/uc?id=0B7y8c3lrgRtUUjRFMHFMQm1BR3M&export=download] On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire mailto:sarah@engageidentity.com> wrote: Looks good. Ship it! Sarah Squire Engage Identity http://engageidentity.com http://engageidentity.com/ On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer mailto:iglazer@salesforce.com> wrote: All - Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards. i -- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166tel:(202)%20255-3166 @iglazerhttps://twitter.com/iglazer _______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.orgmailto:IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc _______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.orgmailto:IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc _______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.orgmailto:IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc -- Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091tel:(613)%20825-2091 kendaggtbs@gmail.commailto:kendaggtbs@gmail.com _______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.orgmailto:IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc -- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 @iglazerhttps://twitter.com/iglazer

Ian Glazer

11 May 11 May

10:08 a.m.

Thanks Megan! I left my latptop at the hotel this morning so it is going to be a few hours before I can get back to Munich and make that fix. I aim to get the final version to the SC list tonight Munich time. My assumption is in doing so it will magically get to the board. Is that true? On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:29 PM Megan Cannon wrote:

...

Hello Ian,

Thanks so much for this thoughtful document. It looks great to me, and I’m looking forward to the discussion.

One minor but important change – On the first page, there are two LL’s in Allan.

Also – I am putting together the numbers of the GPA’s and pledges, broken out by dates, and I’ll share with this group once it is complete.

Thanks, Megan

*From:* idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org [mailto: idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org] *On Behalf Of *Ian Glazer *Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2017 11:08 AM *To:* Ken Dagg *Cc:* idprosc@kantarainitiative.org *Subject:* Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board

I have incorporated all comments into the attached version.

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Ken Dagg wrote:

Ian,

In my opinion this looks good other than for one small point. That point is the use of "we" in the first sentence: "First and foremost, we, on behalf of the entire IDPro community, want to thank Kantara for its generosity and its willingness to believe in this effort."

I'm not clear who the "we" refers to. In my opinion it should not refer to the IDProSC as it's my understanding that this is a subcommittee of the Kantara Board that has been charged with acting as a "liaison" from the Board to IDPro. It could refer to the IDProDG as this is the group of participants that, through infrastructure provided by Kantara, has been defining IDPro. However, this group, in my opinion, does not represent the "entire IDPro community as membership in the DG was restricted to only those who signed the original pledge. I'd be happier if you would change the we to "the leadership of IDPro".

Part of my reason for bringing this up is that I, as a member of the SC, would not be comfortable signing this letter to the Kantara Board as I see it as a conflict of interest in representing both groups.

Thanks,

Ken

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:17 AM Colin Wallis wrote:

Nearly there IMHO Ian..

I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section.

I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'.

This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do.

I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist.

Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it.

Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May.

This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week.

Cheers

Colin

Executive Director

Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 <+44%207490%20266778>

Kantara Initiative Inc. https://kantarainitiative.org/

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire wrote:

Looks good. Ship it!

Sarah Squire

Engage Identity

http://engageidentity.com

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer wrote:

All -

Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards.

i

--

Ian Glazer

Senior Director, Identity

+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>

@iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

--

Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091 <(613)%20825-2091> kendaggtbs@gmail.com

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

--

Ian Glazer

Senior Director, Identity

+1 202 255 3166

@iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 @iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

Ian Glazer

4:14 p.m.

Minor revision attached. i On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Ian Glazer wrote:

...

Thanks Megan!

I left my latptop at the hotel this morning so it is going to be a few hours before I can get back to Munich and make that fix. I aim to get the final version to the SC list tonight Munich time. My assumption is in doing so it will magically get to the board. Is that true?

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:29 PM Megan Cannon wrote:

...
Hello Ian,

Thanks so much for this thoughtful document. It looks great to me, and I’m looking forward to the discussion.

One minor but important change – On the first page, there are two LL’s in Allan.

Also – I am putting together the numbers of the GPA’s and pledges, broken out by dates, and I’ll share with this group once it is complete.

Thanks, Megan

*From:* idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org [mailto:idprosc-bounces@ kantarainitiative.org] *On Behalf Of *Ian Glazer *Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2017 11:08 AM *To:* Ken Dagg *Cc:* idprosc@kantarainitiative.org *Subject:* Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board

I have incorporated all comments into the attached version.

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Ken Dagg wrote:

Ian,

In my opinion this looks good other than for one small point. That point is the use of "we" in the first sentence: "First and foremost, we, on behalf of the entire IDPro community, want to thank Kantara for its generosity and its willingness to believe in this effort."

I'm not clear who the "we" refers to. In my opinion it should not refer to the IDProSC as it's my understanding that this is a subcommittee of the Kantara Board that has been charged with acting as a "liaison" from the Board to IDPro. It could refer to the IDProDG as this is the group of participants that, through infrastructure provided by Kantara, has been defining IDPro. However, this group, in my opinion, does not represent the "entire IDPro community as membership in the DG was restricted to only those who signed the original pledge. I'd be happier if you would change the we to "the leadership of IDPro".

Part of my reason for bringing this up is that I, as a member of the SC, would not be comfortable signing this letter to the Kantara Board as I see it as a conflict of interest in representing both groups.

Thanks,

Ken

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:17 AM Colin Wallis wrote:

Nearly there IMHO Ian..

I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section.

I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'.

This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do.

I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist.

Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it.

Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May.

This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week.

Cheers

Colin

Executive Director

Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 <+44%207490%20266778>

Kantara Initiative Inc. https://kantarainitiative.org/

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire wrote:

Looks good. Ship it!

Sarah Squire

Engage Identity

http://engageidentity.com

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer wrote:

All -

Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards.

i

--

Ian Glazer

Senior Director, Identity

+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>

@iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

--

Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091 <(613)%20825-2091> kendaggtbs@gmail.com

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

--

Ian Glazer

Senior Director, Identity

+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>

@iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166> @iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 @iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

Megan Cannon

4:25 p.m.

Thank you Ian. If I have everyone’s blessing, we’ll go ahead and get this over to the Board. All the best, Megan From: Ian Glazer [mailto:iglazer@salesforce.com] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 12:15 PM To: Ken Dagg ; Megan Cannon Cc: idprosc@kantarainitiative.org Subject: Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board Minor revision attached. i On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Ian Glazer mailto:iglazer@salesforce.com> wrote: Thanks Megan! I left my latptop at the hotel this morning so it is going to be a few hours before I can get back to Munich and make that fix. I aim to get the final version to the SC list tonight Munich time. My assumption is in doing so it will magically get to the board. Is that true? On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:29 PM Megan Cannon mailto:mcannon@virtualmgmt.com> wrote: Hello Ian, Thanks so much for this thoughtful document. It looks great to me, and I’m looking forward to the discussion. One minor but important change – On the first page, there are two LL’s in Allan. Also – I am putting together the numbers of the GPA’s and pledges, broken out by dates, and I’ll share with this group once it is complete. Thanks, Megan From: idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.orgmailto:idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org [mailto:idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.orgmailto:idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org] On Behalf Of Ian Glazer Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 11:08 AM To: Ken Dagg mailto:kendaggtbs@gmail.com> Cc: idprosc@kantarainitiative.orgmailto:idprosc@kantarainitiative.org Subject: Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board I have incorporated all comments into the attached version. On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Ken Dagg mailto:kendaggtbs@gmail.com> wrote: Ian, In my opinion this looks good other than for one small point. That point is the use of "we" in the first sentence: "First and foremost, we, on behalf of the entire IDPro community, want to thank Kantara for its generosity and its willingness to believe in this effort." I'm not clear who the "we" refers to. In my opinion it should not refer to the IDProSC as it's my understanding that this is a subcommittee of the Kantara Board that has been charged with acting as a "liaison" from the Board to IDPro. It could refer to the IDProDG as this is the group of participants that, through infrastructure provided by Kantara, has been defining IDPro. However, this group, in my opinion, does not represent the "entire IDPro community as membership in the DG was restricted to only those who signed the original pledge. I'd be happier if you would change the we to "the leadership of IDPro". Part of my reason for bringing this up is that I, as a member of the SC, would not be comfortable signing this letter to the Kantara Board as I see it as a conflict of interest in representing both groups. Thanks, Ken On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:17 AM Colin Wallis mailto:colin@kantarainitiative.org> wrote: Nearly there IMHO Ian.. I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section. I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'. This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do. I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist. Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it. Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May. This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week. Cheers Colin Executive Director Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778tel:+44%207490%20266778 Kantara Initiative Inc.https://kantarainitiative.org/ [https://drive.google.com/uc?id=0B7y8c3lrgRtUUjRFMHFMQm1BR3M&export=download] On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire mailto:sarah@engageidentity.com> wrote: Looks good. Ship it! Sarah Squire Engage Identity http://engageidentity.com http://engageidentity.com/ On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer mailto:iglazer@salesforce.com> wrote: All - Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards. i -- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166tel:(202)%20255-3166 @iglazerhttps://twitter.com/iglazer _______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.orgmailto:IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc _______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.orgmailto:IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc _______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.orgmailto:IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc -- Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091tel:(613)%20825-2091 kendaggtbs@gmail.commailto:kendaggtbs@gmail.com _______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.orgmailto:IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc -- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166tel:(202)%20255-3166 @iglazerhttps://twitter.com/iglazer -- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166tel:(202)%20255-3166 @iglazerhttps://twitter.com/iglazer -- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 @iglazerhttps://twitter.com/iglazer

Sarah Squire

4:27 p.m.

Consider it blessed On May 11, 2017 9:26 AM, "Megan Cannon" wrote:

...

Thank you Ian. If I have everyone’s blessing, we’ll go ahead and get this over to the Board.

All the best,

Megan

*From:* Ian Glazer [mailto:iglazer@salesforce.com] *Sent:* Thursday, May 11, 2017 12:15 PM *To:* Ken Dagg ; Megan Cannon < mcannon@virtualmgmt.com> *Cc:* idprosc@kantarainitiative.org *Subject:* Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board

Minor revision attached.

i

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Ian Glazer wrote:

Thanks Megan!

I left my latptop at the hotel this morning so it is going to be a few hours before I can get back to Munich and make that fix. I aim to get the final version to the SC list tonight Munich time. My assumption is in doing so it will magically get to the board. Is that true?

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:29 PM Megan Cannon wrote:

Hello Ian,

Thanks so much for this thoughtful document. It looks great to me, and I’m looking forward to the discussion.

One minor but important change – On the first page, there are two LL’s in Allan.

Also – I am putting together the numbers of the GPA’s and pledges, broken out by dates, and I’ll share with this group once it is complete.

Thanks, Megan

*From:* idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org [mailto:idprosc-bounces@ kantarainitiative.org] *On Behalf Of *Ian Glazer *Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2017 11:08 AM *To:* Ken Dagg *Cc:* idprosc@kantarainitiative.org *Subject:* Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board

I have incorporated all comments into the attached version.

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Ken Dagg wrote:

Ian,

In my opinion this looks good other than for one small point. That point is the use of "we" in the first sentence: "First and foremost, we, on behalf of the entire IDPro community, want to thank Kantara for its generosity and its willingness to believe in this effort."

I'm not clear who the "we" refers to. In my opinion it should not refer to the IDProSC as it's my understanding that this is a subcommittee of the Kantara Board that has been charged with acting as a "liaison" from the Board to IDPro. It could refer to the IDProDG as this is the group of participants that, through infrastructure provided by Kantara, has been defining IDPro. However, this group, in my opinion, does not represent the "entire IDPro community as membership in the DG was restricted to only those who signed the original pledge. I'd be happier if you would change the we to "the leadership of IDPro".

Part of my reason for bringing this up is that I, as a member of the SC, would not be comfortable signing this letter to the Kantara Board as I see it as a conflict of interest in representing both groups.

Thanks,

Ken

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:17 AM Colin Wallis wrote:

Nearly there IMHO Ian..

I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section.

I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'.

This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do.

I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist.

Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it.

Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May.

This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week.

Cheers

Colin

Executive Director

Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 <+44%207490%20266778>

Kantara Initiative Inc. https://kantarainitiative.org/

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire wrote:

Looks good. Ship it!

Sarah Squire

Engage Identity

http://engageidentity.com

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer wrote:

All -

Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards.

i

--

Ian Glazer

Senior Director, Identity

+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>

@iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

--

Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091 <(613)%20825-2091> kendaggtbs@gmail.com

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

--

Ian Glazer

Senior Director, Identity

+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>

@iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

--

Ian Glazer

Senior Director, Identity

+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>

@iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

--

Ian Glazer

Senior Director, Identity

+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>

@iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

Colin Wallis

10:43 p.m.

Yup, +1. Thanks Executive Director Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 Kantara Initiative Inc. https://kantarainitiative.org/ On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Sarah Squire wrote:

...

Consider it blessed

On May 11, 2017 9:26 AM, "Megan Cannon" wrote:

...
Thank you Ian. If I have everyone’s blessing, we’ll go ahead and get this over to the Board.

All the best,

Megan

*From:* Ian Glazer [mailto:iglazer@salesforce.com] *Sent:* Thursday, May 11, 2017 12:15 PM *To:* Ken Dagg ; Megan Cannon < mcannon@virtualmgmt.com> *Cc:* idprosc@kantarainitiative.org *Subject:* Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board

Minor revision attached.

i

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Ian Glazer wrote:

Thanks Megan!

I left my latptop at the hotel this morning so it is going to be a few hours before I can get back to Munich and make that fix. I aim to get the final version to the SC list tonight Munich time. My assumption is in doing so it will magically get to the board. Is that true?

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:29 PM Megan Cannon wrote:

Hello Ian,

Thanks so much for this thoughtful document. It looks great to me, and I’m looking forward to the discussion.

One minor but important change – On the first page, there are two LL’s in Allan.

Also – I am putting together the numbers of the GPA’s and pledges, broken out by dates, and I’ll share with this group once it is complete.

Thanks, Megan

*From:* idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org [mailto: idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org] *On Behalf Of *Ian Glazer *Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2017 11:08 AM *To:* Ken Dagg *Cc:* idprosc@kantarainitiative.org *Subject:* Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board

I have incorporated all comments into the attached version.

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Ken Dagg wrote:

Ian,

In my opinion this looks good other than for one small point. That point is the use of "we" in the first sentence: "First and foremost, we, on behalf of the entire IDPro community, want to thank Kantara for its generosity and its willingness to believe in this effort."

I'm not clear who the "we" refers to. In my opinion it should not refer to the IDProSC as it's my understanding that this is a subcommittee of the Kantara Board that has been charged with acting as a "liaison" from the Board to IDPro. It could refer to the IDProDG as this is the group of participants that, through infrastructure provided by Kantara, has been defining IDPro. However, this group, in my opinion, does not represent the "entire IDPro community as membership in the DG was restricted to only those who signed the original pledge. I'd be happier if you would change the we to "the leadership of IDPro".

Part of my reason for bringing this up is that I, as a member of the SC, would not be comfortable signing this letter to the Kantara Board as I see it as a conflict of interest in representing both groups.

Thanks,

Ken

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:17 AM Colin Wallis wrote:

Nearly there IMHO Ian..

I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section.

I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'.

This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do.

I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist.

Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it.

Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May.

This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week.

Cheers

Colin

Executive Director

Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 <+44%207490%20266778>

Kantara Initiative Inc. https://kantarainitiative.org/

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire wrote:

Looks good. Ship it!

Sarah Squire

Engage Identity

http://engageidentity.com

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer wrote:

All -

Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards.

i

--

Ian Glazer

Senior Director, Identity

+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>

@iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

--

Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091 <(613)%20825-2091> kendaggtbs@gmail.com

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

--

Ian Glazer

Senior Director, Identity

+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>

@iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

--

Ian Glazer

Senior Director, Identity

+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>

@iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

--

Ian Glazer

Senior Director, Identity

+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>

@iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

Ken Dagg

12 May 12 May

12:11 p.m.

Apologies, I thought I had replied +1 before but don't see it in the chain, Ken On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 6:44 PM Colin Wallis wrote:

...

Yup, +1. Thanks

Executive Director Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 Kantara Initiative Inc. https://kantarainitiative.org/

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Sarah Squire wrote:

...
Consider it blessed

On May 11, 2017 9:26 AM, "Megan Cannon" wrote:

...
Thank you Ian. If I have everyone’s blessing, we’ll go ahead and get this over to the Board.

All the best,

Megan

*From:* Ian Glazer [mailto:iglazer@salesforce.com] *Sent:* Thursday, May 11, 2017 12:15 PM *To:* Ken Dagg ; Megan Cannon < mcannon@virtualmgmt.com> *Cc:* idprosc@kantarainitiative.org *Subject:* Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board

Minor revision attached.

i

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Ian Glazer wrote:

Thanks Megan!

I left my latptop at the hotel this morning so it is going to be a few hours before I can get back to Munich and make that fix. I aim to get the final version to the SC list tonight Munich time. My assumption is in doing so it will magically get to the board. Is that true?

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:29 PM Megan Cannon wrote:

Hello Ian,

Thanks so much for this thoughtful document. It looks great to me, and I’m looking forward to the discussion.

One minor but important change – On the first page, there are two LL’s in Allan.

Also – I am putting together the numbers of the GPA’s and pledges, broken out by dates, and I’ll share with this group once it is complete.

Thanks, Megan

*From:* idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org [mailto: idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org] *On Behalf Of *Ian Glazer *Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2017 11:08 AM *To:* Ken Dagg *Cc:* idprosc@kantarainitiative.org *Subject:* Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board

I have incorporated all comments into the attached version.

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Ken Dagg wrote:

Ian,

In my opinion this looks good other than for one small point. That point is the use of "we" in the first sentence: "First and foremost, we, on behalf of the entire IDPro community, want to thank Kantara for its generosity and its willingness to believe in this effort."

I'm not clear who the "we" refers to. In my opinion it should not refer to the IDProSC as it's my understanding that this is a subcommittee of the Kantara Board that has been charged with acting as a "liaison" from the Board to IDPro. It could refer to the IDProDG as this is the group of participants that, through infrastructure provided by Kantara, has been defining IDPro. However, this group, in my opinion, does not represent the "entire IDPro community as membership in the DG was restricted to only those who signed the original pledge. I'd be happier if you would change the we to "the leadership of IDPro".

Part of my reason for bringing this up is that I, as a member of the SC, would not be comfortable signing this letter to the Kantara Board as I see it as a conflict of interest in representing both groups.

Thanks,

Ken

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:17 AM Colin Wallis < colin@kantarainitiative.org> wrote:

Nearly there IMHO Ian..

I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section.

I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'.

This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do.

I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist.

Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it.

Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May.

This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week.

Cheers

Colin

Executive Director

Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 <+44%207490%20266778>

Kantara Initiative Inc. https://kantarainitiative.org/

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire wrote:

Looks good. Ship it!

Sarah Squire

Engage Identity

http://engageidentity.com

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer wrote:

All -

Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards.

i

--

Ian Glazer

Senior Director, Identity

+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>

@iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

--

Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091 <(613)%20825-2091> kendaggtbs@gmail.com

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

--

Ian Glazer

Senior Director, Identity

+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>

@iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

--

Ian Glazer

Senior Director, Identity

+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>

@iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

--

Ian Glazer

Senior Director, Identity

+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>

@iglazer https://twitter.com/iglazer

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc

-- Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091 kendaggtbs@gmail.com

2603

Age (days ago)

2606

Last active (days ago)

List overview

Download

12 comments

6 participants

participants (6)

Andrew Hughes
Colin Wallis
Ian Glazer
Ken Dagg
Megan Cannon
Sarah Squire

Response to the Board

tags

participants (6)