All - Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards. i -- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 @iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
Looks good. Ship it! Sarah Squire Engage Identity http://engageidentity.com On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com> wrote:
All -
Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards.
i
-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166> @iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
Nearly there IMHO Ian.. I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section. I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'. This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do. I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist. Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it. Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May. This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week. Cheers Colin Executive Director Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 Kantara Initiative Inc. <https://kantarainitiative.org/> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire <sarah@engageidentity.com> wrote:
Looks good. Ship it!
Sarah Squire Engage Identity http://engageidentity.com
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com> wrote:
All -
Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards.
i
-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166> @iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
Ian, In my opinion this looks good other than for one small point. That point is the use of "we" in the first sentence: "First and foremost, we, on behalf of the entire IDPro community, want to thank Kantara for its generosity and its willingness to believe in this effort." I'm not clear who the "we" refers to. In my opinion it should not refer to the IDProSC as it's my understanding that this is a subcommittee of the Kantara Board that has been charged with acting as a "liaison" from the Board to IDPro. It could refer to the IDProDG as this is the group of participants that, through infrastructure provided by Kantara, has been defining IDPro. However, this group, in my opinion, does not represent the "entire IDPro community as membership in the DG was restricted to only those who signed the original pledge. I'd be happier if you would change the we to "the leadership of IDPro". Part of my reason for bringing this up is that I, as a member of the SC, would not be comfortable signing this letter to the Kantara Board as I see it as a conflict of interest in representing both groups. Thanks, Ken On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:17 AM Colin Wallis <colin@kantarainitiative.org> wrote:
Nearly there IMHO Ian..
I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section.
I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'.
This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do. I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist.
Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it.
Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May.
This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week.
Cheers Colin
Executive Director Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 Kantara Initiative Inc. <https://kantarainitiative.org/>
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire <sarah@engageidentity.com> wrote:
Looks good. Ship it!
Sarah Squire Engage Identity http://engageidentity.com
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com> wrote:
All -
Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards.
i
-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166> @iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
-- Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091 kendaggtbs@gmail.com
I have incorporated all comments into the attached version. On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Ken Dagg <kendaggtbs@gmail.com> wrote:
Ian,
In my opinion this looks good other than for one small point. That point is the use of "we" in the first sentence: "First and foremost, we, on behalf of the entire IDPro community, want to thank Kantara for its generosity and its willingness to believe in this effort."
I'm not clear who the "we" refers to. In my opinion it should not refer to the IDProSC as it's my understanding that this is a subcommittee of the Kantara Board that has been charged with acting as a "liaison" from the Board to IDPro. It could refer to the IDProDG as this is the group of participants that, through infrastructure provided by Kantara, has been defining IDPro. However, this group, in my opinion, does not represent the "entire IDPro community as membership in the DG was restricted to only those who signed the original pledge. I'd be happier if you would change the we to "the leadership of IDPro".
Part of my reason for bringing this up is that I, as a member of the SC, would not be comfortable signing this letter to the Kantara Board as I see it as a conflict of interest in representing both groups.
Thanks, Ken
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:17 AM Colin Wallis <colin@kantarainitiative.org> wrote:
Nearly there IMHO Ian..
I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section.
I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'.
This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do. I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist.
Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it.
Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May.
This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week.
Cheers Colin
Executive Director Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 <+44%207490%20266778> Kantara Initiative Inc. <https://kantarainitiative.org/>
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire <sarah@engageidentity.com> wrote:
Looks good. Ship it!
Sarah Squire Engage Identity http://engageidentity.com
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com> wrote:
All -
Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards.
i
-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166> @iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
-- Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091 <(613)%20825-2091> kendaggtbs@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 @iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
I'll try to review tonight... On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 5:08 PM Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com> wrote:
I have incorporated all comments into the attached version.
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Ken Dagg <kendaggtbs@gmail.com> wrote:
Ian,
In my opinion this looks good other than for one small point. That point is the use of "we" in the first sentence: "First and foremost, we, on behalf of the entire IDPro community, want to thank Kantara for its generosity and its willingness to believe in this effort."
I'm not clear who the "we" refers to. In my opinion it should not refer to the IDProSC as it's my understanding that this is a subcommittee of the Kantara Board that has been charged with acting as a "liaison" from the Board to IDPro. It could refer to the IDProDG as this is the group of participants that, through infrastructure provided by Kantara, has been defining IDPro. However, this group, in my opinion, does not represent the "entire IDPro community as membership in the DG was restricted to only those who signed the original pledge. I'd be happier if you would change the we to "the leadership of IDPro".
Part of my reason for bringing this up is that I, as a member of the SC, would not be comfortable signing this letter to the Kantara Board as I see it as a conflict of interest in representing both groups.
Thanks, Ken
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:17 AM Colin Wallis <colin@kantarainitiative.org> wrote:
Nearly there IMHO Ian..
I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section.
I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'.
This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do. I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist.
Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it.
Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May.
This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week.
Cheers Colin
Executive Director Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 <+44%207490%20266778> Kantara Initiative Inc. <https://kantarainitiative.org/>
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire <sarah@engageidentity.com> wrote:
Looks good. Ship it!
Sarah Squire Engage Identity http://engageidentity.com
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com> wrote:
All -
Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards.
i
-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166> @iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
-- Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091 <(613)%20825-2091> kendaggtbs@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 @iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer> _______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
-- *Andrew Hughes *CISM CISSP Independent Consultant *In Turn Information Management Consulting* o +1 650.209.7542 m +1 250.888.9474 1249 Palmer Road, Victoria, BC V8P 2H8 AndrewHughes3000@gmail.com ca.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-hughes/a/58/682/ *Identity Management | IT Governance | Information Security *
Hello Ian, Thanks so much for this thoughtful document. It looks great to me, and I’m looking forward to the discussion. One minor but important change – On the first page, there are two LL’s in Allan. Also – I am putting together the numbers of the GPA’s and pledges, broken out by dates, and I’ll share with this group once it is complete. Thanks, Megan From: idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org [mailto:idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org] On Behalf Of Ian Glazer Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 11:08 AM To: Ken Dagg <kendaggtbs@gmail.com> Cc: idprosc@kantarainitiative.org Subject: Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board I have incorporated all comments into the attached version. On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Ken Dagg <kendaggtbs@gmail.com<mailto:kendaggtbs@gmail.com>> wrote: Ian, In my opinion this looks good other than for one small point. That point is the use of "we" in the first sentence: "First and foremost, we, on behalf of the entire IDPro community, want to thank Kantara for its generosity and its willingness to believe in this effort." I'm not clear who the "we" refers to. In my opinion it should not refer to the IDProSC as it's my understanding that this is a subcommittee of the Kantara Board that has been charged with acting as a "liaison" from the Board to IDPro. It could refer to the IDProDG as this is the group of participants that, through infrastructure provided by Kantara, has been defining IDPro. However, this group, in my opinion, does not represent the "entire IDPro community as membership in the DG was restricted to only those who signed the original pledge. I'd be happier if you would change the we to "the leadership of IDPro". Part of my reason for bringing this up is that I, as a member of the SC, would not be comfortable signing this letter to the Kantara Board as I see it as a conflict of interest in representing both groups. Thanks, Ken On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:17 AM Colin Wallis <colin@kantarainitiative.org<mailto:colin@kantarainitiative.org>> wrote: Nearly there IMHO Ian.. I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section. I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'. This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do. I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist. Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it. Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May. This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week. Cheers Colin Executive Director Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778<tel:+44%207490%20266778> Kantara Initiative Inc.<https://kantarainitiative.org/> [https://drive.google.com/uc?id=0B7y8c3lrgRtUUjRFMHFMQm1BR3M&export=download] On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire <sarah@engageidentity.com<mailto:sarah@engageidentity.com>> wrote: Looks good. Ship it! Sarah Squire Engage Identity http://engageidentity.com<http://engageidentity.com/> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com<mailto:iglazer@salesforce.com>> wrote: All - Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards. i -- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166<tel:(202)%20255-3166> @iglazer<https://twitter.com/iglazer> _______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org<mailto:IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc _______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org<mailto:IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc _______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org<mailto:IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc -- Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091<tel:(613)%20825-2091> kendaggtbs@gmail.com<mailto:kendaggtbs@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org<mailto:IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc -- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 @iglazer<https://twitter.com/iglazer>
Thanks Megan! I left my latptop at the hotel this morning so it is going to be a few hours before I can get back to Munich and make that fix. I aim to get the final version to the SC list tonight Munich time. My assumption is in doing so it will magically get to the board. Is that true? On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:29 PM Megan Cannon <mcannon@virtualmgmt.com> wrote:
Hello Ian,
Thanks so much for this thoughtful document. It looks great to me, and I’m looking forward to the discussion.
One minor but important change – On the first page, there are two LL’s in Allan.
Also – I am putting together the numbers of the GPA’s and pledges, broken out by dates, and I’ll share with this group once it is complete.
Thanks, Megan
*From:* idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org [mailto: idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org] *On Behalf Of *Ian Glazer *Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2017 11:08 AM *To:* Ken Dagg <kendaggtbs@gmail.com> *Cc:* idprosc@kantarainitiative.org *Subject:* Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board
I have incorporated all comments into the attached version.
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Ken Dagg <kendaggtbs@gmail.com> wrote:
Ian,
In my opinion this looks good other than for one small point. That point is the use of "we" in the first sentence: "First and foremost, we, on behalf of the entire IDPro community, want to thank Kantara for its generosity and its willingness to believe in this effort."
I'm not clear who the "we" refers to. In my opinion it should not refer to the IDProSC as it's my understanding that this is a subcommittee of the Kantara Board that has been charged with acting as a "liaison" from the Board to IDPro. It could refer to the IDProDG as this is the group of participants that, through infrastructure provided by Kantara, has been defining IDPro. However, this group, in my opinion, does not represent the "entire IDPro community as membership in the DG was restricted to only those who signed the original pledge. I'd be happier if you would change the we to "the leadership of IDPro".
Part of my reason for bringing this up is that I, as a member of the SC, would not be comfortable signing this letter to the Kantara Board as I see it as a conflict of interest in representing both groups.
Thanks,
Ken
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:17 AM Colin Wallis <colin@kantarainitiative.org> wrote:
Nearly there IMHO Ian..
I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section.
I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'.
This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do.
I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist.
Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it.
Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May.
This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week.
Cheers
Colin
Executive Director
Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 <+44%207490%20266778>
Kantara Initiative Inc. <https://kantarainitiative.org/>
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire <sarah@engageidentity.com> wrote:
Looks good. Ship it!
Sarah Squire
Engage Identity
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com> wrote:
All -
Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards.
i
--
Ian Glazer
Senior Director, Identity
+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>
@iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
--
Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091 <(613)%20825-2091> kendaggtbs@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
--
Ian Glazer
Senior Director, Identity
+1 202 255 3166
@iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 @iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
Minor revision attached. i On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com> wrote:
Thanks Megan!
I left my latptop at the hotel this morning so it is going to be a few hours before I can get back to Munich and make that fix. I aim to get the final version to the SC list tonight Munich time. My assumption is in doing so it will magically get to the board. Is that true?
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:29 PM Megan Cannon <mcannon@virtualmgmt.com> wrote:
Hello Ian,
Thanks so much for this thoughtful document. It looks great to me, and I’m looking forward to the discussion.
One minor but important change – On the first page, there are two LL’s in Allan.
Also – I am putting together the numbers of the GPA’s and pledges, broken out by dates, and I’ll share with this group once it is complete.
Thanks, Megan
*From:* idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org [mailto:idprosc-bounces@ kantarainitiative.org] *On Behalf Of *Ian Glazer *Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2017 11:08 AM *To:* Ken Dagg <kendaggtbs@gmail.com> *Cc:* idprosc@kantarainitiative.org *Subject:* Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board
I have incorporated all comments into the attached version.
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Ken Dagg <kendaggtbs@gmail.com> wrote:
Ian,
In my opinion this looks good other than for one small point. That point is the use of "we" in the first sentence: "First and foremost, we, on behalf of the entire IDPro community, want to thank Kantara for its generosity and its willingness to believe in this effort."
I'm not clear who the "we" refers to. In my opinion it should not refer to the IDProSC as it's my understanding that this is a subcommittee of the Kantara Board that has been charged with acting as a "liaison" from the Board to IDPro. It could refer to the IDProDG as this is the group of participants that, through infrastructure provided by Kantara, has been defining IDPro. However, this group, in my opinion, does not represent the "entire IDPro community as membership in the DG was restricted to only those who signed the original pledge. I'd be happier if you would change the we to "the leadership of IDPro".
Part of my reason for bringing this up is that I, as a member of the SC, would not be comfortable signing this letter to the Kantara Board as I see it as a conflict of interest in representing both groups.
Thanks,
Ken
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:17 AM Colin Wallis <colin@kantarainitiative.org> wrote:
Nearly there IMHO Ian..
I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section.
I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'.
This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do.
I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist.
Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it.
Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May.
This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week.
Cheers
Colin
Executive Director
Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 <+44%207490%20266778>
Kantara Initiative Inc. <https://kantarainitiative.org/>
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire <sarah@engageidentity.com> wrote:
Looks good. Ship it!
Sarah Squire
Engage Identity
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com> wrote:
All -
Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards.
i
--
Ian Glazer
Senior Director, Identity
+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>
@iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
--
Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091 <(613)%20825-2091> kendaggtbs@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
--
Ian Glazer
Senior Director, Identity
+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>
@iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166> @iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
-- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 @iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
Thank you Ian. If I have everyone’s blessing, we’ll go ahead and get this over to the Board. All the best, Megan From: Ian Glazer [mailto:iglazer@salesforce.com] Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2017 12:15 PM To: Ken Dagg <kendaggtbs@gmail.com>; Megan Cannon <mcannon@virtualmgmt.com> Cc: idprosc@kantarainitiative.org Subject: Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board Minor revision attached. i On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com<mailto:iglazer@salesforce.com>> wrote: Thanks Megan! I left my latptop at the hotel this morning so it is going to be a few hours before I can get back to Munich and make that fix. I aim to get the final version to the SC list tonight Munich time. My assumption is in doing so it will magically get to the board. Is that true? On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:29 PM Megan Cannon <mcannon@virtualmgmt.com<mailto:mcannon@virtualmgmt.com>> wrote: Hello Ian, Thanks so much for this thoughtful document. It looks great to me, and I’m looking forward to the discussion. One minor but important change – On the first page, there are two LL’s in Allan. Also – I am putting together the numbers of the GPA’s and pledges, broken out by dates, and I’ll share with this group once it is complete. Thanks, Megan From: idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org<mailto:idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org> [mailto:idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org<mailto:idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org>] On Behalf Of Ian Glazer Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 11:08 AM To: Ken Dagg <kendaggtbs@gmail.com<mailto:kendaggtbs@gmail.com>> Cc: idprosc@kantarainitiative.org<mailto:idprosc@kantarainitiative.org> Subject: Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board I have incorporated all comments into the attached version. On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Ken Dagg <kendaggtbs@gmail.com<mailto:kendaggtbs@gmail.com>> wrote: Ian, In my opinion this looks good other than for one small point. That point is the use of "we" in the first sentence: "First and foremost, we, on behalf of the entire IDPro community, want to thank Kantara for its generosity and its willingness to believe in this effort." I'm not clear who the "we" refers to. In my opinion it should not refer to the IDProSC as it's my understanding that this is a subcommittee of the Kantara Board that has been charged with acting as a "liaison" from the Board to IDPro. It could refer to the IDProDG as this is the group of participants that, through infrastructure provided by Kantara, has been defining IDPro. However, this group, in my opinion, does not represent the "entire IDPro community as membership in the DG was restricted to only those who signed the original pledge. I'd be happier if you would change the we to "the leadership of IDPro". Part of my reason for bringing this up is that I, as a member of the SC, would not be comfortable signing this letter to the Kantara Board as I see it as a conflict of interest in representing both groups. Thanks, Ken On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:17 AM Colin Wallis <colin@kantarainitiative.org<mailto:colin@kantarainitiative.org>> wrote: Nearly there IMHO Ian.. I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section. I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'. This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do. I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist. Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it. Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May. This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week. Cheers Colin Executive Director Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778<tel:+44%207490%20266778> Kantara Initiative Inc.<https://kantarainitiative.org/> [https://drive.google.com/uc?id=0B7y8c3lrgRtUUjRFMHFMQm1BR3M&export=download] On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire <sarah@engageidentity.com<mailto:sarah@engageidentity.com>> wrote: Looks good. Ship it! Sarah Squire Engage Identity http://engageidentity.com<http://engageidentity.com/> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com<mailto:iglazer@salesforce.com>> wrote: All - Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards. i -- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166<tel:(202)%20255-3166> @iglazer<https://twitter.com/iglazer> _______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org<mailto:IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc _______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org<mailto:IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc _______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org<mailto:IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc -- Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091<tel:(613)%20825-2091> kendaggtbs@gmail.com<mailto:kendaggtbs@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org<mailto:IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc -- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166<tel:(202)%20255-3166> @iglazer<https://twitter.com/iglazer> -- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166<tel:(202)%20255-3166> @iglazer<https://twitter.com/iglazer> -- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 @iglazer<https://twitter.com/iglazer>
Consider it blessed On May 11, 2017 9:26 AM, "Megan Cannon" <mcannon@virtualmgmt.com> wrote:
Thank you Ian. If I have everyone’s blessing, we’ll go ahead and get this over to the Board.
All the best,
Megan
*From:* Ian Glazer [mailto:iglazer@salesforce.com] *Sent:* Thursday, May 11, 2017 12:15 PM *To:* Ken Dagg <kendaggtbs@gmail.com>; Megan Cannon < mcannon@virtualmgmt.com> *Cc:* idprosc@kantarainitiative.org *Subject:* Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board
Minor revision attached.
i
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com> wrote:
Thanks Megan!
I left my latptop at the hotel this morning so it is going to be a few hours before I can get back to Munich and make that fix. I aim to get the final version to the SC list tonight Munich time. My assumption is in doing so it will magically get to the board. Is that true?
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:29 PM Megan Cannon <mcannon@virtualmgmt.com> wrote:
Hello Ian,
Thanks so much for this thoughtful document. It looks great to me, and I’m looking forward to the discussion.
One minor but important change – On the first page, there are two LL’s in Allan.
Also – I am putting together the numbers of the GPA’s and pledges, broken out by dates, and I’ll share with this group once it is complete.
Thanks, Megan
*From:* idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org [mailto:idprosc-bounces@ kantarainitiative.org] *On Behalf Of *Ian Glazer *Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2017 11:08 AM *To:* Ken Dagg <kendaggtbs@gmail.com> *Cc:* idprosc@kantarainitiative.org *Subject:* Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board
I have incorporated all comments into the attached version.
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Ken Dagg <kendaggtbs@gmail.com> wrote:
Ian,
In my opinion this looks good other than for one small point. That point is the use of "we" in the first sentence: "First and foremost, we, on behalf of the entire IDPro community, want to thank Kantara for its generosity and its willingness to believe in this effort."
I'm not clear who the "we" refers to. In my opinion it should not refer to the IDProSC as it's my understanding that this is a subcommittee of the Kantara Board that has been charged with acting as a "liaison" from the Board to IDPro. It could refer to the IDProDG as this is the group of participants that, through infrastructure provided by Kantara, has been defining IDPro. However, this group, in my opinion, does not represent the "entire IDPro community as membership in the DG was restricted to only those who signed the original pledge. I'd be happier if you would change the we to "the leadership of IDPro".
Part of my reason for bringing this up is that I, as a member of the SC, would not be comfortable signing this letter to the Kantara Board as I see it as a conflict of interest in representing both groups.
Thanks,
Ken
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:17 AM Colin Wallis <colin@kantarainitiative.org> wrote:
Nearly there IMHO Ian..
I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section.
I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'.
This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do.
I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist.
Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it.
Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May.
This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week.
Cheers
Colin
Executive Director
Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 <+44%207490%20266778>
Kantara Initiative Inc. <https://kantarainitiative.org/>
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire <sarah@engageidentity.com> wrote:
Looks good. Ship it!
Sarah Squire
Engage Identity
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com> wrote:
All -
Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards.
i
--
Ian Glazer
Senior Director, Identity
+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>
@iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
--
Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091 <(613)%20825-2091> kendaggtbs@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
--
Ian Glazer
Senior Director, Identity
+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>
@iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
--
Ian Glazer
Senior Director, Identity
+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>
@iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
--
Ian Glazer
Senior Director, Identity
+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>
@iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
Yup, +1. Thanks Executive Director Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 Kantara Initiative Inc. <https://kantarainitiative.org/> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Sarah Squire <sarah@engageidentity.com> wrote:
Consider it blessed
On May 11, 2017 9:26 AM, "Megan Cannon" <mcannon@virtualmgmt.com> wrote:
Thank you Ian. If I have everyone’s blessing, we’ll go ahead and get this over to the Board.
All the best,
Megan
*From:* Ian Glazer [mailto:iglazer@salesforce.com] *Sent:* Thursday, May 11, 2017 12:15 PM *To:* Ken Dagg <kendaggtbs@gmail.com>; Megan Cannon < mcannon@virtualmgmt.com> *Cc:* idprosc@kantarainitiative.org *Subject:* Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board
Minor revision attached.
i
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com> wrote:
Thanks Megan!
I left my latptop at the hotel this morning so it is going to be a few hours before I can get back to Munich and make that fix. I aim to get the final version to the SC list tonight Munich time. My assumption is in doing so it will magically get to the board. Is that true?
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:29 PM Megan Cannon <mcannon@virtualmgmt.com> wrote:
Hello Ian,
Thanks so much for this thoughtful document. It looks great to me, and I’m looking forward to the discussion.
One minor but important change – On the first page, there are two LL’s in Allan.
Also – I am putting together the numbers of the GPA’s and pledges, broken out by dates, and I’ll share with this group once it is complete.
Thanks, Megan
*From:* idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org [mailto: idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org] *On Behalf Of *Ian Glazer *Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2017 11:08 AM *To:* Ken Dagg <kendaggtbs@gmail.com> *Cc:* idprosc@kantarainitiative.org *Subject:* Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board
I have incorporated all comments into the attached version.
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Ken Dagg <kendaggtbs@gmail.com> wrote:
Ian,
In my opinion this looks good other than for one small point. That point is the use of "we" in the first sentence: "First and foremost, we, on behalf of the entire IDPro community, want to thank Kantara for its generosity and its willingness to believe in this effort."
I'm not clear who the "we" refers to. In my opinion it should not refer to the IDProSC as it's my understanding that this is a subcommittee of the Kantara Board that has been charged with acting as a "liaison" from the Board to IDPro. It could refer to the IDProDG as this is the group of participants that, through infrastructure provided by Kantara, has been defining IDPro. However, this group, in my opinion, does not represent the "entire IDPro community as membership in the DG was restricted to only those who signed the original pledge. I'd be happier if you would change the we to "the leadership of IDPro".
Part of my reason for bringing this up is that I, as a member of the SC, would not be comfortable signing this letter to the Kantara Board as I see it as a conflict of interest in representing both groups.
Thanks,
Ken
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:17 AM Colin Wallis <colin@kantarainitiative.org> wrote:
Nearly there IMHO Ian..
I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section.
I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'.
This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do.
I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist.
Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it.
Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May.
This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week.
Cheers
Colin
Executive Director
Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 <+44%207490%20266778>
Kantara Initiative Inc. <https://kantarainitiative.org/>
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire <sarah@engageidentity.com> wrote:
Looks good. Ship it!
Sarah Squire
Engage Identity
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com> wrote:
All -
Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards.
i
--
Ian Glazer
Senior Director, Identity
+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>
@iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
--
Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091 <(613)%20825-2091> kendaggtbs@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
--
Ian Glazer
Senior Director, Identity
+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>
@iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
--
Ian Glazer
Senior Director, Identity
+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>
@iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
--
Ian Glazer
Senior Director, Identity
+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>
@iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
Apologies, I thought I had replied +1 before but don't see it in the chain, Ken On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 6:44 PM Colin Wallis <colin@kantarainitiative.org> wrote:
Yup, +1. Thanks
Executive Director Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 Kantara Initiative Inc. <https://kantarainitiative.org/>
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Sarah Squire <sarah@engageidentity.com> wrote:
Consider it blessed
On May 11, 2017 9:26 AM, "Megan Cannon" <mcannon@virtualmgmt.com> wrote:
Thank you Ian. If I have everyone’s blessing, we’ll go ahead and get this over to the Board.
All the best,
Megan
*From:* Ian Glazer [mailto:iglazer@salesforce.com] *Sent:* Thursday, May 11, 2017 12:15 PM *To:* Ken Dagg <kendaggtbs@gmail.com>; Megan Cannon < mcannon@virtualmgmt.com> *Cc:* idprosc@kantarainitiative.org *Subject:* Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board
Minor revision attached.
i
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com> wrote:
Thanks Megan!
I left my latptop at the hotel this morning so it is going to be a few hours before I can get back to Munich and make that fix. I aim to get the final version to the SC list tonight Munich time. My assumption is in doing so it will magically get to the board. Is that true?
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 8:29 PM Megan Cannon <mcannon@virtualmgmt.com> wrote:
Hello Ian,
Thanks so much for this thoughtful document. It looks great to me, and I’m looking forward to the discussion.
One minor but important change – On the first page, there are two LL’s in Allan.
Also – I am putting together the numbers of the GPA’s and pledges, broken out by dates, and I’ll share with this group once it is complete.
Thanks, Megan
*From:* idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org [mailto: idprosc-bounces@kantarainitiative.org] *On Behalf Of *Ian Glazer *Sent:* Wednesday, May 10, 2017 11:08 AM *To:* Ken Dagg <kendaggtbs@gmail.com> *Cc:* idprosc@kantarainitiative.org *Subject:* Re: [Idprosc] Response to the Board
I have incorporated all comments into the attached version.
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Ken Dagg <kendaggtbs@gmail.com> wrote:
Ian,
In my opinion this looks good other than for one small point. That point is the use of "we" in the first sentence: "First and foremost, we, on behalf of the entire IDPro community, want to thank Kantara for its generosity and its willingness to believe in this effort."
I'm not clear who the "we" refers to. In my opinion it should not refer to the IDProSC as it's my understanding that this is a subcommittee of the Kantara Board that has been charged with acting as a "liaison" from the Board to IDPro. It could refer to the IDProDG as this is the group of participants that, through infrastructure provided by Kantara, has been defining IDPro. However, this group, in my opinion, does not represent the "entire IDPro community as membership in the DG was restricted to only those who signed the original pledge. I'd be happier if you would change the we to "the leadership of IDPro".
Part of my reason for bringing this up is that I, as a member of the SC, would not be comfortable signing this letter to the Kantara Board as I see it as a conflict of interest in representing both groups.
Thanks,
Ken
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 4:17 AM Colin Wallis < colin@kantarainitiative.org> wrote:
Nearly there IMHO Ian..
I think the SC needs to raise the IPR transfer issue in the Legal and Financial Separation section. While it is in the checklist, I think the Board will be asking themselves the question about why is IPR missing, when they read that section.
I think the SC needs to add a final brief section 'Recommendation'.
This should say, what exactly what the SC wants the Board to do.
I think that Recommendation asks the Board to accept and approve the paper at its May 2017 Board meeting, and ask that they provide any comments to assist the SC in actioning the checklist.
Now they may reject the paper, and provide substantial comments to underpin that rationale. It is unlikely, but the SC cannot discount it.
Could you be available to present the paper at the Board meeting? It is 5pm ET Thursday 18th May.
This paper needs to be confirmed by the SC in the next 24 hours or so, so it can be sent in the Board package at the end of the week.
Cheers
Colin
Executive Director
Cell: +44 (0)7490 266 778 <+44%207490%20266778>
Kantara Initiative Inc. <https://kantarainitiative.org/>
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Sarah Squire <sarah@engageidentity.com> wrote:
Looks good. Ship it!
Sarah Squire
Engage Identity
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:15 AM, Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com> wrote:
All -
Attached is my second pass at a Board response. I believe this is ready to send onwards.
i
--
Ian Glazer
Senior Director, Identity
+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>
@iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
--
Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091 <(613)%20825-2091> kendaggtbs@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
--
Ian Glazer
Senior Director, Identity
+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>
@iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
--
Ian Glazer
Senior Director, Identity
+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>
@iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
--
Ian Glazer
Senior Director, Identity
+1 202 255 3166 <(202)%20255-3166>
@iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
_______________________________________________ IDProSC mailing list IDProSC@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/idprosc
-- Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication 613-825-2091 kendaggtbs@gmail.com
participants (6)
-
Andrew Hughes -
Colin Wallis -
Ian Glazer -
Ken Dagg -
Megan Cannon -
Sarah Squire