Jim and Sal, good evening, and thanks for the Harvard AI article.

The article is informative today as it was a year ago when published. Today AI complexity has a built in multiplier effect with States and Federal government directives along with agency guidelines, AI guardrails, draft regs and the Supreme Court’s new direction for Congress in developing measured (detailed) statutes, all in the mix with supercomputers. I believe it will be a while we see clarity and informative direction.

In the near term I do not feel AI will have a direct impact on WG publications, but AI should not be ignored. What I do anticipate this year is NIST launching 800-63-4 and that will impact all populations including the underserved and the Digital Identifier Inclusion document.

Have a restful evening,

 

Jim Kragh


On Sun, Jul 7, 2024 at 11:41 AM jim pasquale <jimpasquale@gmail.com> wrote:
Does this help or hurt the LC’s position on the use of AI in publications by WGs’ 

Explain — the use case

Sent from an iPad 




On Jul 6, 2024, at 9:53 PM, Salvatore D'Agostino <sal@idmachines.com> wrote:

 _______________________________________________
A Community Group mailing list of KantaraInitiative.org
LC mailing list -- lc@kantarainitiative.org
To unsubscribe send an email to staff@kantarainitiative.org
List archives --  https://mailman.kantarainitiative.org/hyperkitty/list/lc@kantarainitiative.org/
______
Group wiki -- https://kantara.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/LC

_______________________________________________
A Community Group mailing list of KantaraInitiative.org
LC mailing list -- lc@kantarainitiative.org
To unsubscribe send an email to staff@kantarainitiative.org
List archives --  https://mailman.kantarainitiative.org/hyperkitty/list/lc@kantarainitiative.org/
______
Group wiki -- https://kantara.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/LC