I’m not going to block it mark - but be aware that it is very confusing and might not be appropriate for sc27/wg5. But you will get the feedback from the national experts that you seek. It is shoddily written and unclear. And if you say it’s not for “identity” then why do you cite 800-63? You are very inconsistent. Andrew Hughes CISM m +1 250.888.9474 AndrewHughes3000@gmail.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-hughes-682058a On Sat, Apr 6, 2024 at 8:09 PM Mark Lizar <mark@transparencylab.ca> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
The TPS scheme is directed at Regulators and in this contribution is pecific contributed towards 27566-2, where we are working to iterate this towards and ISO benchmarking program. There is a lot to do, and of course more resources are required..
But in the end, this scheme and the technology to implemented are for the Privacy Regulatory or Data Privacy Authority, who are interested in the scheme as a transparency auditing tool set. As the ANCR Work is reg-tech rather than identity technology. Which has always been a struggle to communicate, especially to those who are unaware of who the target audience is,
Yesterday I asked for your input on this asking you in your role for recommendations or comments. Do you have any advice or recommendations? As LC Chair, and ISO Liaison, your positive support is not only requested in your role it should be required. Especially if you are going to block it. Perhaps this is something that should be raised to the Board?
Best,
Mark
On 6 Apr 2024, at 20:55, Andrew Hughes <andrewhughes3000@gmail.com> wrote:
I'm sorry Sal - but I have a very hard time understanding what the document tries to describe or what the ask is. If it is to inform the ISO committee of work going on outside of ISO, then it does a confusing and poor job. There are a whole bunch of claims that "the scheme" or "the TPI" or some other things actively "do" things - no mention of WHO or WHAT takes action - it's all super-vague and seems to paint a wishful-thinking world.
In it's current state I do not support sending this document outside of Kantara. ———————— *Andrew Hughes *CISM m +1 250.888.9474 AndrewHughes3000@gmail.com
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 7:01 AM Salvatore D'Agostino <sal@idmachines.com> wrote:
Cleaned up further
Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef> ------------------------------ *From:* MarkL <mark@0pn.org> *Sent:* Friday, April 5, 2024 9:58:18 AM *To:* Tim Loyd <timl@transparencylab.ca> *Cc:* timothy Reiniger <tsreiniger@gmail.com>; Sharon Polsky < Sharon.polsky@aminacorp.ca>; Kate Tilleczek <katetill@edu.yorku.ca>; Paul Knowles <paul.knowles@meddea.global>; Salvatore D'Agostino < sal@idmachines.com> *Subject:* Fwd: FOR REVIEW: updated paper
FYI - the polished version,
Begin forwarded message:
*From: *Tara Sinclair <tara.sinclair@reddialcomms.co.uk> *Subject: **FOR REVIEW: updated paper* *Date: *5 April 2024 at 13:15:29 BST *To: *Mark Lizar <mark@transparencylab.ca>, MarkL <mark@0pn.org>
Incorporating your latest changes
_______________________________________________ A Community Group mailing list of KantaraInitiative.org LC mailing list -- lc@kantarainitiative.org To unsubscribe send an email to staff@kantarainitiative.org List archives -- https://mailman.kantarainitiative.org/hyperkitty/list/lc@kantarainitiative.o... ______ Group wiki -- https://kantara.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/LC
_______________________________________________
A Community Group mailing list of KantaraInitiative.org LC mailing list -- lc@kantarainitiative.org To unsubscribe send an email to staff@kantarainitiative.org List archives -- https://mailman.kantarainitiative.org/hyperkitty/list/lc@kantarainitiative.o... ______ Group wiki -- https://kantara.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/LC
Mark Lizar Executive Director 0PN; Digital Transparency Lab (Digital iDentity, Transparency, Trust & Consent Engineering) * Toronto +1 -289 - 501 -3597 * London +44 208 -123 2476