Unsigned.

This is an off week.

I suggest that we work with the google doc asynchronously to accomplish the below, and review at the recurring biweekly meeting next week.

From: Salvatore D'Agostino
Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 12:35 PM
To: Mark Lizar <mark@transparencylab.ca>; Gigi <gigi@transparencylab.ca>
Cc: wg-ancr@kantarainitiative.org
Subject: RE: ANCR TPR - Next Steps.

I agree with this.

I believe we have gotten to this point already and are trying to publish the TPR Specification as such.

From: Mark Lizar <mark@transparencylab.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2025 12:21 PM
To: Salvatore D'Agostino <sal@idmachines.com>; Gigi <gigi@transparencylab.ca>
Cc: wg-ancr@kantarainitiative.org
Subject: ANCR TPR - Next Steps.

Dear ANCR,

After having a break from the TPR report, and mulling it over. I think i have figured out how to disentangled the elements we have. I recommend, that we specify the report without the schema, and put the schema in the appendix, (take the rating from the appendix and put in the main document.  

Then I recommend  we spin the schema up into a separate document (lightweight) as a digital identity controller record schema.  In the context of  a secure notice information record structure, for both security of industrial uses, non-personal information, as well as personal information.  Then do a really nice security and privacy considerations section. 

  we practically have two documents we can quickly finish and produce to a stable draft, and lots to blog about. 

Kind Regards,

Mark Lizar

Mark Lizar
Executive Director
Transparency Lab
@ Global Privacy Rights