Resent unsigned... -----Original Message----- From: Salvatore D'Agostino Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2025 7:26 PM To: Mark @ 0PN <mark@0pn.org> Cc: Tim Reiniger <tsreiniger@gmail.com>; wg-ancr@kantarainitiative.org Subject: RE: TPI Specification Ready for Vote [WG-ANCR] latest version of document Hi Mark, Please use the email address that is approved for distribution on the list. I did not see the email below, I will go into mailman to deal with this. Tomorrow is not a regular meeting. I suggest we spend the time cleaning up the document further for grammar and other style issues. I don't know this is best done on a call. It really is the work of the editor. Amanda and I have already made multiple passes to get it to this point, it is in a much better state as a result, but as Sharon points out, not quite publication ready. Someone needs to take ownership for this next round of updates. That is typically the role of the editor. I suggest we go back to the word doc, and the editor try to catch these issues which are mostly grammar and style, to track those change and then circulate that to the wg prior to the call in two weeks. If you don't want to take on this task I am happy to do that. Does this make sense. Sincerely, Sal -----Original Message----- From: Mark @ 0PN <mark@0pn.org> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2025 7:03 PM To: Salvatore D'Agostino <sal@idmachines.com> Cc: Tim Reiniger <tsreiniger@gmail.com>; wg-ancr@kantarainitiative.org Subject: Re: TPI Specification Ready for Vote [WG-ANCR] latest version of document Hi All, I spoke too soon, it does need some more polishing.. that was just a little fire drill. ( so no vote tomorrw, but expect am update0 Best - Mark
On 13 May 2025, at 18:06, Mark @ 0PN <mark@0pn.org> wrote:
Helloo Wg,
Very nice work on this, can really tell when effort goes into documents (in this age of AI) As discussed here is the pdf version,
With a couple of updates to highlight 1. Update to title 2. Update to terms see line 265 to 276
It is pleasure to present to this back to the list, (thank you Sal for that) , this has the editors approval as very crispy looking specification!
Perhaps, If there are no insurmountable objections ? We could move to vote on this tomorrow in the WG call at 1pm eastern?
Happy Privmaz
Mark
PS - Dated Tomorrow.