Hi Sal,
A receipt based system would be amazing, which is why I want to reference the great work at ANCR,
I have drafted an email to promote this work for this purpose, highlighting the progress. My question was slightly more procedural, in that, I was referring to the Controller Identification specification.
On a previous wg Call we discussed pulling the controller identification record into its own document and I took this action then I drafted its and i posted this for collaboration, comment - and discussion.
Regardless of whether it makes it to the ANCR roadmap or not? Is there any objection to making saving this wiki page so it is to the public again? I can put a note on it, - saying proposed worked item, if that is a concern,
Yes, I object, ___
No, I dont object ____
Abstain ______
Best Regards
Mark
On 13 May 2025, at 12:19, Salvatore D'Agostino <sal@idmachines.com> wrote:
So, clearly it would be great to get the EU to move ahead with receipts as means for small business.
We can take up making this public on the call tomorrow, it is an “off-week” call. So we need to put this out to the list to let people know this is happening.
From: Tim Reiniger <tsreiniger@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2025 12:05 PM
To: Mark Lizar <smartopian@icloud.com>
Cc: Salvatore D'Agostino <sal@idmachines.com>
Subject: Re: Breaking news: opportunity to present ancr work as EU ROPA replacement for SME's
Interesting idea to bring Eve Maler back for a reprise on UMA!
Subject: Breaking news: opportunity to present ancr work as EU ROPA replacement for SME's
Date: 10 May 2025 at 15:10:31 GMT-4
Hi All,
in light of calls to update the GDPR - and make it easy for Small Business, by derogating the ROPA, record requirements for small businesses in the EU, i reached out to ask, why not implement consent receipts instead? (To the person who put consent receipts in the EU Digital Markets Act in the first place)
His response was to send him an email with this as an alternative approach so that he can share this with the EU Justice Department team.
As a part of my response, I would like to update them on how far the Consent Receipt work has evolved in the last 6 years into Standard Operational Transparency record information structure, that can be used for international consent record based information flows. (International Consent which was the objective of the work)
Mentioning how the Kanatara Consent Receipt work was
- Used and is in use by industry
- Adopted into:
- ISO/IEC 27560: 2023 About to become an open standard (in 2025 Fall)
- Extending the open and free to access ISO/IEC 29100 - privacy framework (recently updated)
- TPI Benchmark for Valid Consent, coming out (next week Tbc)
- Conv 108+ being ratified(next month Tbc)
To add to this, would there be any objections to making the ANCR
Controller Identification Record. Spec (On the ANCR Wiki) publicly accessible so I can include it in my response ?
Are there any objections to making the draft of the Controller Identification Record Spec publicly accessible ?
