Hi Richard,

Thankyou very much for sending this through.

I agree with you, I have been spending hours on it and it is slow going.

Divide and conquer sounds good, especially as I am going through all of it so we could cover it that way.

That said, I have been looking through your spreadsheet and despite your point that it is slow I think that is a consequence of the obvious thoroughness you are applying.

Thanks,

Caro

On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 2:19 PM Richard G. WILSHER (@Zygma Inc.) <RGW@zygma.biz> wrote:

If I have missed any other postings of review comments re. -63 rev.4, apologies. 
I’ve gone for reviewing -63A before anything else, normative clauses only, and its slow going.  Maybe we need to divide and conquer – some on A, some on B, some on C?  I suspect the base doc is worthy of attention from everyone since it, theoretically at least, affects A, B and C ?

Anyway, here are my scattered thoughts thus far.

 

Richard G. WILSHER
CEO & Founder,  Zygma Inc.
www.Zygma.biz
+1 714 797 9942

 

_______________________________________________
A Community Group mailing list of KantaraInitiative.org
WG-IDAssurance mailing list -- wg-idassurance@kantarainitiative.org
To unsubscribe send an email to staff@kantarainitiative.org
List archives --  https://mailman.kantarainitiative.org/hyperkitty/list/wg-idassurance@kantarainitiative.org/
______
Group wiki -- https://kantara.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/WG-IDAssurance