The Thursday agenda for FedID looks sketchy.  But if I don’t dial in – that’s why

 

From: Amanda Gay <amanda@kantarainitiative.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2024 3:32 PM
To: wg-idassurance@kantarainitiative.org
Subject: [WG-IDAssurance] Invitation and Agenda - IAWG - June 27, 2024

 

Dear IAWG Members:

Please join us Thursday, June 27, at 12PM ET for our next IAWG meeting. 

 

For review-prior to the call:

o NIST's 63B Supplement for Syncable Authenticators 

 

The proposed agenda and Zoom details are below. 

 

Date and Time

·  Date: Thursday, 2024-06-27

·  Time: 9:00 PT | 12:00 ET (time zone calculator)

o Please join the meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone: https://zoom.us/j/93167965850?pwd=dldoT0hYK1k4MkVGYkQ3TkNqdG1Idz09 

o Meeting ID: 931 6796 5850

o Passcode: 884696

o You can also dial in using your phone. Find your local number: https://zoom.us/u/aeg9vt8LSr

o Need to add IAWG meetings to your calendar? Do so here!

DRAFT 6.27.2024

  1. Administration:

o    Roll call, determination of quorum.

§  Moved Zaid Al Bukhari to nonvoting due to non-attendance.  Quorum is now 5 out of 8 voting participants.

o    Minutes approval 

§  2024.06.13 Minutes DRAFT

§  2024.05.30 Minutes DRAFT

§  2024.05.16 Minutes DRAFT

o    Kantara Updates

o    Assurance Updates

2.            IAWG Actions/Reminders/Updates:

    • Proposed Meeting Cadence for June/Extended Summer
      • June 13, June 27
      • July 11, July 25
      • August 8, August 22
    • Informal poll from LC to determine overall use of AI in report/content generation (goal is to decide whether a policy is needed)
      • "Have you used Chat-gpt or other AI tools to help generate or contribute to any group content or reports?"
      • 8 votes total - 1 ineligible vote (cast by nonmember) = 7 total votes (out of 9)
        1. Quorum was achieved
        2. Question 1: 6 approve, 1 disapprove
        3. Question 2: 5 approve, 1 disapprove (one respondent skipped this question)
      • Update on next steps
    • Address of Record update:
      • Address of Record–(most recent version from February 8th with ARB Comment); response in progress

3.            ISO 17065 Discussion Items

4.            Group Discussion:  

    • Potential Criteria Updates
      • Discussion: re: 63B#1340, 63A#0130 b) (Jimmy Jung’s email on May 28th),  and  63B#0120. Led by Jimmy.
      • Initial discussion to determine if any criteria need changing
    • ARB comment on potential bug in 63A#0510 criteria (Lynzie)
      • Talks about biometric performance requirements which is more about measuring algorithmic performance and not human performance. If using a human, this cannot be done.
      • #0510 references 63B authentication criteria and authentication doesn’t recognize human verification of the biometric against some portrait or reference biometric. The 63B criteria is only applicable to automated biometric systems.

5.            Any Other Business

Best,

-A

--

Amanda Gay | Administrative Coordinator

 

Twitter:    @KantaraNews

LinkedIn:  @KantaraInitiative