My understanding is that the cryptographic modules that are validating the signatures need to be FIPS level 1 certified. The authenticators for AAL3 would need to be FIPS-140 level 2 physical 3 certified. There is a FIPS authenticator requirement at AAL2 as well but it is L1 physical 3 I think. It is in SP-800-63. John B.
On Apr 6, 2024, at 5:30 AM, Jimmy Jung <jimmy.jung@slandala.com> wrote:
We have mostly avoided the federal agency/FIPS 140 criteria, but I was looking at 63B#0120, which is taken word for word from 800-63B and requires “verifiers to meet FIPS 140 Level 1 or higher.” “Verifiers” refers to an organization, typically the CSP – specifically, 63 defines it as “an entity that verifies the claimant’s identity by verifying the claimant’s possession and control of one or two authenticators using an authentication protocol. To do this, the verifier may also need to validate credentials that link the authenticator(s) to the subscriber’s identifier and check their status.” But FIPS 140 is Security Requirements for devices, specifically Cryptography and Cryptographic Modules. So, I can’t figure out what they want here. 63B#0120
Federal agencies SHALL only operate verifiers which have been validated as meeting FIPS 140 Level 1 or higher. (possibly that cryptographic authenticators should meet FIPS 140 – but that would appear to conflict with other criteria and guidance?)
Jimmy
_______________________________________________ A Community Group mailing list of KantaraInitiative.org <http://kantarainitiative.org/> WG-IDAssurance mailing list -- wg-idassurance@kantarainitiative.org <mailto:wg-idassurance@kantarainitiative.org> To unsubscribe send an email to staff@kantarainitiative.org <mailto:staff@kantarainitiative.org> List archives -- https://mailman.kantarainitiative.org/hyperkitty/list/wg-idassurance@kantara... ______ Group wiki -- https://kantara.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/WG-IDAssurance