Revised version of the draft for CompAlt – whereas the previous version was limited to a single FAIR piece of evidence, that didn’t much help the conversation which led to the CompAlt solution being raised again, which was a conjectured single Unsupervised SUPERIOR with no human interaction. And on re-reading 63 rev.3 §5.4, it imposes no such limitation on strength or quantity of criteria. So here is the unlimited version of the draft criteria. The changes are marked so you can review the proposed amendments. Thanks, Richard G. WILSHER CEO & Founder, Zygma Inc. www.Zygma.biz +1 714 797 9942 From: Richard G. WILSHER (@Zygma Inc.) [mailto:RGW@Zygma.biz] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2024 21:52 To: IA WG (wg-idassurance@kantarainitiative.org) Subject: Formalising 'Comparable Alternative' criteria As actioned at today’s IAWG meeting, I attach the criteria which I used for a recent assessment (since Approved by the ARB). At the time I did not assign ‘63A#’ tags since they were assessor-introduced criteria, but I have proposed use of 63A#0700 and #0710 in the attached doc, and of course the ‘Assessor-introduced criterion’ annotation should be removed prior to ublication and become ‘Kantara-specific’. Proposed new criteria are in red with blue background – for context a couple of existing (albeit Kantara-specific in one instance) are also included. Happy to receive feedback next week. Richard G. WILSHER CEO & Founder, Zygma Inc. www.Zygma.biz +1 714 797 9942