Good morning!
May I suggest that we, RIUP WG, fine tune and approve changes made to page 9 of the PCQ document as we had planned.  Then vote on that PCQ document for it 
represents the RIUP WG effort. We can then have an open discussion on recommendations advanced (without our knowledge) which would be enlightening input for
both us (RIUP WG) and the Leadership Council when they meet in two weeks.  

Given the foregoing change, I will start our WG meeting with a PCQ discussion and hopefully a vote. It would be great if we could present the LC with the PCQ this month since this
is their first meeting for 2025. And if we are really efficient with our time, we should also hear from Justin and Noreen who have also met off line in preparation for our 
meeting today.       Let's make it happen!          Meeting prep: please read page 9 (red content) of PCQ doc and then proofread, for continuity, the PCQ  so you can vote!

Have a good morning!

Jim

On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 11:29 PM Tom Jones <thomasclinganjones@gmail.com> wrote:
Not sure how this happened by the PCQ: doc has been updated based on input from PEMC and ANCR teams and is now at this address.   Please check it out as some suggestions were proposed for review.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_fr86TyT7H6MfeBbQ8h-jcuEFvvrcx4vFuKgORpo4BY/edit?usp=sharing


Peace ..tom jones


On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 5:34 PM jim kragh <kragh65@gmail.com> wrote:
 Meeting ID: 850 7719 7313 Passcode: 000935

Good evening to all!

There are two items on our agenda tomorrow. The first 30 minutes will be devoted to refreshing the RIUP Charter with Justin (Vice Chair) and Noreen (Secretary) guiding us through
 the review process with a focus on the first two paragraphs. 

The remaining 30 minutes of our WG meeting will be devoted to hopefully approving the Inclusive Purpose Consent Query (PCQ) document. Tom J. has been the lead on this effort  and has revised the red content on page 9.

The document (link) content has been generally accepted by the WG with the exception of page 9 content entitled Verifier Processing of Holder Response. If the revised content is approved or is revised, and accepted,  the WG can then vote on approving the PCQ document so it can be reviewed by the Leadership Council.   

May all have a restful night and a good week,

Jim