Not sure we'll work on this at all in tomorrow's call, but I did want to
finally clean this up. Please see slides 9-12
<https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1I12agEsfaJK3LEiJyROrJV3PCEmhlCzCxYS…>
in particular. (Remember, if you haven't accessed the deck before, I'll
need to give you permission.)
Basically what I've done is convert from a table/matrix approach to keeping
the "spaghetti"/visual approach when delving into the particulars of the
legal device-to-technical artifact mappings. A sample is below.
Jim has mentioned to me that he has a good candidate use case we could POC,
and I hope to see him end of next week to work on this a bit. Building up a
realistic set of agreements/licenses/resulting artifacts/flows is key.
*Eve Maler*Cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl
