Cigdem was suggesting a way to clarify a key set math formula in Grant Sec 3.3.4 during our rev 07 review, and I was struggling to figure out a way to format it the way she was suggesting, so in rev 08 I had just left it in place without changing it. But we figured out a rhetorical vs. formatting change that might clarify things a bit more: to change from this...“{∪ resource {RequestedScopes\CandidateGrantedScopes}={}” to this:"{∪_of_resource {RequestedScopes\CandidateGrantedScopes}={}" The intent is to say that you take the union over all the resource-mapped sets of the diff between RequestedScopes and CandidateGrantedScopes, and if that's empty, then you've got a slam-dunk case of issuing the RPT. The snippet "∪ resource" may be sufficient to convey that, but we thought "∪_of_resource" could be better. (Or maybe someone has some other improvement that's even better.)If we have quorum in our call today, we could do a new motion just like the e-ballot to rev to 09 with that update, assuming we think it's necessary.
_______________________________________________
WG-UMA mailing list
WG-UMA@kantarainitiative.org
https://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-uma