The overhead associated with fully distributed development when there is a clear core team is not worth the headaches it can cause, especially since nobody that I can see would be taking the job of patch integrator to manage all the pull requests. Having an editor create a pull request and then merge it themselves into the main repository is just a waste of that editor’s time.
Only primary editors should have write access to the repository and should be allowed to make changes directly to it. Things that are WG consensus should go on “master” (or the appropriate version-tracked major branch), proposed solutions and text by the primary editors should go on branches in the main repository and brought to the group for feedback.
Non-editors (like myself) can fork the repository, branch, and create either pull requests or simply reference commits and issues from there.
— Justin
Hi all,
I refer to my earlier email - any comments? :-) Thanks!
Maciej
_______________________________________________
WG-UMA mailing list
WG-UMA@kantarainitiative.orghttp://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-uma