Re: [WG-UMA] required claims definition: array of object?

Can you just say array.. -----Original Message----- From: wg-uma-bounces@kantarainitiative.org [mailto:wg-uma-bounces@kantarainitiative.org] On Behalf Of Mike Schwartz Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2017 10:26 AM To: uma wg Subject: [WG-UMA] required claims definition: array of object? Another editorial suggestion... https://docs.kantarainitiative.org/uma/ed/oauth-uma-grant-2.0-04.html#author ization-failure required_claims "An array containing parameters that describe the required claims, with the following subparameters:" Is parameters the right word there? Would objects be better? Maybe something like: required_claims "An array containing objects that describe the required claims, with the following keys." - Mike _______________________________________________ WG-UMA mailing list WG-UMA@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-uma