Jon Neiditz
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
Suite 2800 | 1100 Peachtree Street NE | Atlanta, GA 30309-4528
office 404 815 6004 | cell 678-427-7809 | fax 770 234 6341
jneiditz@kilpatricktownsend.com |
My Profile
| vCard
From: Mike O'Neill [mailto:michael.oneill@baycloud.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 11:21 AM
To: 'James Hazard'
Cc: Neiditz, Jon; 'WG UMA'; 'ProjectVRM list'
Subject: RE: [projectvrm] Re: [WG-UMA] The Death of Safe Harbor is the Ultimate VRM and UMA Legal Opportunity
Correct. Consent must be “freely given, specific and informed”. Even if the basis is “legitimate interest” they still have the right to opt-out,
by automated means (if that is still in the GDPR).
From: James Hazard [mailto:james.g.hazard@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 October 2015 15:48
To: Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com>
Cc: Neiditz, Jon <JNeiditz@kilpatricktownsend.com>; WG UMA <wg-uma@kantarainitiative.org>; ProjectVRM list <projectvrm@eon.law.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [projectvrm] Re: [WG-UMA] The Death of Safe Harbor is the Ultimate VRM and UMA Legal Opportunity
So, roughly,
?/
"I consent to You taking the Specified Personal Information to the US. You agree to: protect it, use it only for Specified Purposes, inform me of Leaks, and Destroy it when no longer needed for
the Specified Purposes or I ask You to."
Can a person give non-revocable consent to use of data within EU?
/?
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com> wrote:
Consent must be “freely given”, so IMO it follows that it must be revocable (with a “sunset”). Article 29 and many DPAs also have said that.
From: James Hazard [mailto:james.g.hazard@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 October 2015 14:53
To: Neiditz, Jon <JNeiditz@kilpatricktownsend.com>
Cc: WG UMA <wg-uma@kantarainitiative.org>; ProjectVRM list <projectvrm@eon.law.harvard.edu>
Subject: [projectvrm] Re: [WG-UMA] The Death of Safe Harbor is the Ultimate VRM and UMA Legal Opportunity
Do you mean that consent of the person permits transfer of data, but consent is necessarily revocable and data must be destroyed?
On Oct 6, 2015 3:40 PM, "Neiditz, Jon" <JNeiditz@kilpatricktownsend.com> wrote:
Why?
The Advocate General's opinion and the Court's decision both turn on the inability of Safe Harbor to prevent surveillance. NO permitted basis for data transfer prevents surveillance, not Model Clauses, not Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs). Logically, if probably not in immediate corporate and EU national practice, the only bulletproof basis for data transfer to the US is now the ever-so-revocable CONSENT, which presumes no fictitious protection from surveillance.
See also: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/good-morning-safe-harbor-dead-what-does-mean-now-later-jon-neiditz?trk=prof-post
Your thoughts?
Jon Neiditz
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
Suite 2800 | 1100 Peachtree Street NE | Atlanta, GA 30309-4528
office 404 815 6004 | cell 678-427-7809 | fax 770 234 6341
jneiditz@kilpatricktownsend.com | www.kilpatricktownsend.com
________________________________
Confidentiality Notice:
This communication constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 2510, and its disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient intended by the sender of this message. This transmission, and any attachments, may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Please contact us immediately by return e-mail or at 404 815 6500, and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner.
________________________________
***DISCLAIMER*** Per Treasury Department Circular 230: Any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
_______________________________________________
WG-UMA mailing list
WG-UMA@kantarainitiative.org
http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-uma
--
@commonaccord