https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/UMA+legal+subgroup+note...
2018-01-19
Attending: Eve, Colin, Tim, Adrian, Mark, Kathleen
Agenda:
- Final edits to the business model doc draft 7c, taking into
consideration comments collected during UMA telecon 2018-01-18
- Get the draft ready to send to WG members for review in PDF form so we
can do an e-ballot for draft WG report publication
*Regarding the Vermont legislation:* Though the overt focus is blockchain,
Colin has some thoughts about the notion of a "personal identity trust
company". Can we simply have a conversation with the legislators? Yes! Tim
reads the bill as being about identity brokering. Which others could also
provide input? Perhaps those with an eye on the legal landscape as well as
identity and privacy. (John W?) The bill authors have expertise in banking
law. Adrian could talk to them as well – turns out he's already aware of
the effort. We don't want to necessarily derail their "blockchain" focus,
but we want to introduce them to our notion of the ASO as an agent and the
power of that. Colin can help with those experienced on the brokering side,
and mentions some comparative country ID efforts. Adrian mentions India's
identity system Aadhar and their efforts towards greater privacy; he's
involved on the health records side.
*AI:* Tim: Make introductions as appropriate between the Vermont
legislators and the UMAnitarians.
*Business model paper:*
Elevator pitch in doc:
*A Proposed Licensing Model for User-Managed Access*
Can we describe our audience much more directly?
Old: *This paper is intended for audiences who are business-knowledgeable
and experienced with legal devices.*
New: *This paper is intended for professionals in the areas of law,
privacy, risk, compliance, security policy, and business policy,
particularly those responsible for building and running UMA-enabled
services.*
Latest subtitle/elevator pitch: *How the UMA access sharing protocol
together with a licensing model for personal digital assets enables
user-centric control in the network-based information society*
Mike's, with additions: *How UMA enables an individual to control access to
their personal digital assets in the information society <<when UMA-enabled
services are mapped to a licensing model>>*
Playing around/discussion: *UMA protocol (associate it with "privacy" and
"privacy instruments"?) and licensing model *
Further work: *How licensing enables personal digital asset access control
for individuals using services enabled by the UMA protocol, heightening
privacy protection <