For the record, belatedly... Adrian mentioned that my "original proposal" link was broken. Here it is, corrected:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/kantara-initiative-uma-wg/%5Blegal%5D$20rso/kantara-initiative-uma-wg/R6BviQwZGkk/PPGDQCQLCQAJ


Eve Maler
Cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl


On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:50 PM, Eve Maler <eve@xmlgrrl.com> wrote:
http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/UMA+legal+subgroup+notes

Date and Time

2016-04-15

  • Grantee and Resource definitions; how to handle role stacking (Grantor can be Resource Subject, RSO can be ASO, etc.) – handle in a generic way? (see this thread)
  • (Based on input from Scott D.) RSO - ASO model clauses (original proposal):
    • How to parameterize to enable different legal models for handling the granting of "access"?
    • How to identify/parameterize to enable exceptions to normal access/non-access? (see decision tree)
    • How to handle notification requirements?

Attending: ...


Eve Maler
Cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl