+1.. grant is very sympathetic to an authorization protocol

From: wg-uma-bounces@kantarainitiative.org [mailto:wg-uma-bounces@kantarainitiative.org] On Behalf Of Eve Maler
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2016 3:37 PM
To: wg-uma@kantarainitiative.org WG
Subject: [WG-UMA] [legal] New thoughts on "Grantee" vs. "Requesting Party"

After doing a bunch of somewhat related work having to do with consent, and working with the word Grantee in the "requesting party" slot, I came to really appreciate it for its brevity, and believe that it could suffice for our model definition purposes.

The definition might turn into something like this. Thoughts?

A {Person} to whom a {Grantor} may grant access to a digital data resource, and who, if granted access, uses a {Client} to achieve that access. In any one case a {Grantee} may be the same as, or different from, the {Grantor} or {Resource Subject}.

Eve Maler
Cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl