These comments/questions may be mainly for Tim: I'm trying to better understand the foundational laws referenced in the Licensing Model. As I look more closely at UCITA, I wonder about the inclusion of it as a reference in general, since the ABA withdrew their support/endorsement of it--if I'm understanding correctly? Also, out of curiosity, has there ever been consideration of a reverse-EULA as the legal mechanism for users to grant a right to use license (ala what's enabled in UMA) to vendors? A "Vendor Licensing Agreement"? Lisa On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 6:49 AM Eve Maler <eve@xmlgrrl.com> wrote:
We're up to five "regrets" now. If it's just me, I'll drop the line after 10 minutes, and just keep working on business-legal tasks and email responses!
*Eve Maler*Cell or Signal +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 6:15 AM Eve Maler <eve@xmlgrrl.com> wrote:
I’ve gotten three “regrets”, so it might be a short meeting today. If anyone else can’t make it, let me know.
Eve Maler (sent from my iPad) | cell +1 425 345 6756
On Jun 17, 2019, at 6:09 PM, Eve Maler <eve@xmlgrrl.com> wrote:
8am PT at https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/857787301
Tim has sent me some thoughts on the "Proxy" discussion; I'd like us to sort through that. Also, Cigdem and I had a chance in London last week to talk about how the use cases could be described with a more formal calculus, so let's pursue that.
(And yes, we do have a "regular" WG call on Thursday -- please plan to attend that one so we can discuss the IETF/contribution topic!)
*Eve Maler*Cell or Signal +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl
_______________________________________________ WG-UMA mailing list WG-UMA@kantarainitiative.org https://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-uma