As we enter the UMA post-V1.0 era, gaining implementation experience and even being asked by some parties what they should do/not do in the face of the new issues being raised (“should we wait to start implementing?” No!), I thought it would be a good idea to have a clear, documented process and timeline for handling our issue backlog. To that end, I put together a proposal, which I’ve reviewed with Maciej and Thomas so far, and which I’d now like to share with you all: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c50top8X6Aqw3CEVeX_SD2THqO508ihs14QwLem0... As discussed on the last call, there’s interest in putting our “legal” discussion track into a persistent subgroup meeting series, which will leave us free to focus on technical topics for the time being. I think we’ll need to do that to meet the relatively aggressive schedule I’m proposing — please share your thoughts in this thread. Eve Eve Maler | cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl | Calendar: xmlgrrl@gmail.com