Arrgh. Well, that's why I ask these questions. You may have noticed that
you and Justin both came up in the minutes today, so it's certainly
relevant to try and get better alignment.
I know our traditional Thursday hour was giving Peter D a problem but
others could generally make it. Should we use it instead? Adjust slightly
and pick, say, one hour later on Thursday? I'd love to avoid opening things
up completely.
*Eve Maler*Cell or Signal +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter:
@xmlgrrl
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 4:15 PM Adrian Gropper
Tuesday 11 ET conflicts with W3C VCWG which Justin, myself and maybe others tend to attend. Noon ET is W3C CCG.
-Adrian
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 5:12 PM Eve Maler
wrote: We currently have two weekly meeting times identified, which hasn't worked well for a while. We've also been noting for a while that we have a greater need these days for getting-the-word-out types of activities and relatively fewer of hardcore technical work.
I suggested in today's biz-legal call that we keep our Tuesday call times and drop our Thursday call times. You can always see and subscribe to our calendar here https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/Calendar (and I'm happy to add people as invitees to the events). Tuesdays are at 8am PT / 10am CT / 11am ET / 4pm UK / 5pm CET.
Does it cause problems for our voting participants https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/Participant+Roster, or other denizens, to turn the Tuesday call series into our "real" calls? We'd design agenda topics according to current need.
I'd like to change things up starting immediately, so please speak up if you've got a challenge.
*Eve Maler*Cell or Signal +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl
_______________________________________________ WG-UMA mailing list WG-UMA@kantarainitiative.org https://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-uma