Arrgh. Well, that's why I ask these questions. You may have noticed that you and Justin both came up in the minutes today, so it's certainly relevant to try and get better alignment.

I know our traditional Thursday hour was giving Peter D a problem but others could generally make it. Should we use it instead? Adjust slightly and pick, say, one hour later on Thursday? I'd love to avoid opening things up completely.

Eve Maler
Cell or Signal +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 4:15 PM Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com> wrote:

Tuesday 11 ET conflicts with W3C VCWG which Justin, myself and maybe others tend to attend. Noon ET is W3C CCG.

-Adrian

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 5:12 PM Eve Maler <eve@xmlgrrl.com> wrote:

We currently have two weekly meeting times identified, which hasn't worked well for a while. We've also been noting for a while that we have a greater need these days for getting-the-word-out types of activities and relatively fewer of hardcore technical work.

I suggested in today's biz-legal call that we keep our Tuesday call times and drop our Thursday call times. You can always see and subscribe to our calendar here (and I'm happy to add people as invitees to the events). Tuesdays are at 8am PT / 10am CT / 11am ET / 4pm UK / 5pm CET.

Does it cause problems for our voting participants, or other denizens, to turn the Tuesday call series into our "real" calls? We'd design agenda topics according to current need.

I'd like to change things up starting immediately, so please speak up if you've got a challenge.

Eve Maler
Cell or Signal +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl

_______________________________________________
WG-UMA mailing list
WG-UMA@kantarainitiative.org
https://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-uma