Mike, Justin,

I reviewed the most recently sent list of issue nominations and I think that it might be better to start with targeting the issues marked for resolution today (13 August 2015). Lets first sort out these things taking into account what Eve commented on well in the other email thread - i.e. linear process of spec approvals. The proposed agile approach, honestly, sounds good to me!

I also need to agree with Mike regarding the number of calls that members can afford. Similarly, i'd be happy to hear Justin's comments what else could be maybe done to make some progress in parallel, if possible?

Cheers,

Maciej

On 12 August 2015 at 19:20, Mike Schwartz <mike@gluu.org> wrote:

In short: we don't have to wait, so let's not.

Justin,

I think Eve is doing a good job prioritizing the issues, and also getting feedback from the group on which issues to address. We've extended the calls to 90 minutes per week to specifically accommodate recent feedback we've gotten from implementers like you and others who are also now more actively engaged right now in development now that 1.0 came out.

I don't think the group can afford to have more than one call per week, as we did last year to get the initial 1.0 spec to the finish line.

I guess I'm wondering what else you think we can do to enable us to move in parallel like you suggest.

- Mike
_______________________________________________
WG-UMA mailing list
WG-UMA@kantarainitiative.org
http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-uma

Maciej Machulak
email: maciej.machulak@gmail.com
mobile: +44 7999 606 767 (UK)
mobile: +48 602 45 31 66 (PL)