How much of RFC7591 would be different in a specification for how a resource owner registers their home-built authorization server with a protected resource?<div><br></div><div>Adrian<br><br>On Saturday, July 18, 2015, Eve Maler &lt;<a href="mailto:notifications@github.com">notifications@github.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p>UMA Core contains a number of references to [DynClientReg], which spec is now IETF RFC 7591. The normative reference should be updated to point to the final document:</p>

<p><a href="https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7591" target="_blank">https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7591</a></p>

<p style="font-size:small;color:#666">—<br>Reply to this email directly or <a href="https://github.com/xmlgrrl/UMA-Specifications/issues/174" target="_blank">view it on GitHub</a>.<img alt="" height="1" src="https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AAIeYYSfLd0PKBpIEtYnfggbkDI2Lva0ks5oewcLgaJpZM4FbYZV.gif" width="1"></p>
<div>
  <div>
    
    
  </div>
  
</div>
</blockquote></div><br><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr">Adrian Gropper MD<span style="font-size:11pt"></span><font size="1"><br><font size="2">Ensure Health Information Privacy. Support Patient Privacy Rights.<br></font></font><span style="font-size:11pt"><font size="1"></font></span><font size="2"><a href="http://patientprivacyrights.org/donate-2/" target="_blank"><font color="blue"><u>http://patientprivacyrights.org/donate-2/</u></font></a><font color="blue"><u>  </u></font></font><span style="font-size:11pt"></span><span style="font-size:11pt"></span><span style="font-size:11pt"><font size="1"> <br></font><div></div></span><br></div><br>