https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/UMA+legal+subgroup+notes#UMAlegalsubgroupnotes-2017-11-10

2017-11-10

Attending: Eve, Jeff, Devon, Theresa, Mark, Kathleen, Tim, Ann, John

Doc homework:

The "collaborative diagrams" in the GSlides need more differentiation and "iconification".

"Model clauses" specifically means they need regulatory approval, so how about "template clauses" or even "clause templates" or something? Templates will do for now.

Let's get more specific about pain points. 

"Through a combination of strengthening data protection regulations, justified consumer cynicism and savviness about poor security and AdTech/MarTech ecosystems, and good rationales for data sharing, particularly in the cases of healthcare and the Internet of Things, we're seeing people start to be given just a little more transparency into and control of their personal data. Organizations have never had more incentives to make changes and reduce friction..."

The healthcare construct of a "consent directive" can be directly and favorably compared to ToS opt-in (or, for that matter, opt-out – soon to be made effectively illegal by GDPR) as a mechanism for inviting individuals to express their data sharing preferences in ways that are not influenced by outside actors. UMA enables this construct to be digitized in a standard and repeatable way. This framework enables it to be 

AIs:

Be sure to see all the new comments in the doc.


Eve Maler
Cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl