We've collected a series of issues at the nexus of #trust, #ROctrl ("RO can meaningfully throttle access that RS gives"), and #ROctrl ("RS can throttle access beyond AS-imposed limits"), and "consent and notice and information sharing matters" that we have nicknamed shoebox thanks to Andrew Hughes. Here are the relevant issues; you can see some of them go way back in time!


These issues variously detail use cases in the UMA context. This mega-issue is connected to various other efforts, including our own UMA Legal subgroup (see particularly these notes), the Consent and Information Sharing WG's Consent Receipt work (note that the CR spec has just gone out for Public Review on Jan 6), FHIR (for its "Consent" structure), and possibly others.

Consent records and transaction records and signed notifications of exceptions, etc., are usually conceived of as being useful to store in a secure transaction repository of some kind. Some questions:
Please feel free to add your own questions (or answers)...

Eve Maler
Cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl