Interesting. I like that they seemed to prove people were changing their
behavior in response to learning about unneeded permissions. Unfortunately,
the choice is a coarse-grained one: Don't install/use the app. They note
another possibility with their mention of "A Privacy Preserving API Layer",
which sort of describes an UMA approach in their Section 8 (Recommended
Best Practices), only in the guise of one-off proprietary solutions.
We should perhaps reach out to these folks, since their Section 9 (Related
Work) says "To our knowledge, this is the first work that studies the
problem of user privacy in the context of 3rd party apps on top of cloud
storage providers", and from a quick search they appear not to mention UMA
at all -- or even OAuth, whose mechanisms they're basically describing
throughout the paper. Maybe they'd be interested to take on a research
project around adding UMA to the mix.
*Eve Maler*Cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Adrian Gropper
The paper is a must-read for anyone trying to understand scope design of APIs as well as those that would design registries or trust frameworks to guide users that are considering signing up for an new app or web service.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.05661
arXiv:1608.05661 (*cross-listing*) Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 07:36:11 GMT (2469kb,D)
Title: The Curious Case of the PDF Converter that Likes Mozart: Dissecting and Mitigating the Privacy Risk of Personal Cloud Apps Authors: Hamza Harkous, Rameez Rahman, Bojan Karlas, Karl Aberer Categories: cs.CY cs.HC Journal-ref: Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. Volume 2016, Issue 4, Pages 123-143, ISSN (Online) 2299-0984 DOI: 10.1515/popets-2016-0032 \\ Third party apps that work on top of personal cloud services such as Google Drive and Dropbox, require access to the user's data in order to provide some functionality. Through detailed analysis of a hundred popular Google Drive apps from Google's Chrome store, we discover that the existing permission model is quite often misused: around two thirds of analyzed apps are over-privileged, i.e., they access more data than is needed for them to function. In this work, we analyze three different permission models that aim to discourage users from installing over-privileged apps. In experiments with 210 real users, we discover that the most successful permission model is our novel ensemble method that we call Far-reaching Insights. Far-reaching Insights inform the users about the data-driven insights that apps can make about them (e.g., their topics of interest, collaboration and activity patterns etc.) Thus, they seek to bridge the gap between what third parties can actually know about users and users perception of their privacy leakage. The efficacy of Far-reaching Insights in bridging this gap is demonstrated by our results, as Far-reaching Insights prove to be, on average, twice as effective as the current model in discouraging users from installing over-privileged apps. In an effort for promoting general privacy awareness, we deploy a publicly available privacy oriented app store that uses Far-reaching Insights. Based on the knowledge extracted from data of the store's users (over 115 gigabytes of Google Drive data from 1440 users with 662 installed apps), we also delineate the ecosystem for third-party cloud apps from the standpoint of developers and cloud providers. Finally, we present several general recommendations that can guide other future works in the area of privacy for the cloud.
--
Adrian Gropper MD
PROTECT YOUR FUTURE - RESTORE Health Privacy! HELP us fight for the right to control personal health data. DONATE: http://patientprivacyrights.org/donate-2/
_______________________________________________ WG-UMA mailing list WG-UMA@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-uma