Hi all— Please take a look at the draft specs and submit any issues you see to GitHub. This is intended to be your last call prior to our Public Review vote: Core 2015-09-03 <https://docs.kantarainitiative.org/uma/draft-uma-core-v1_0_1-2015-09-03.html> RSR 2015-09-03 <https://docs.kantarainitiative.org/uma/draft-oauth-resource-reg-v1_0_1-2015-09-03.html> As you review, please keep in mind these still-“live” questions: Okay with final permission ticket section <https://docs.kantarainitiative.org/uma/draft-uma-core-v1_0_1-2015-09-03.html#ticket-management> wording? Is “without an RPT” appropriate in notes like this one <https://docs.kantarainitiative.org/uma/draft-uma-core-v1_0_1-2015-09-03.html#protection-api> (which appear several times in Core), versus “without an access token”? Does the Core doc restructuring (to satisfy issue #179) work? (I sure hope so…would hate to have to undo it :-) And keep an eye on the top of the GitHub issues list <https://github.com/KantaraInitiative/wg-uma/issues> for other issues you may want to weigh in on. Thanks, Eve Eve Maler | cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl | Calendar: xmlgrrl@gmail.com