On Jul 19, 2015, at 9:14 PM, Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com> wrote:How much of RFC7591 would be different in a specification for how a resource owner registers their home-built authorization server with a protected resource?Adrian
On Saturday, July 18, 2015, Eve Maler <notifications@github.com> wrote:UMA Core contains a number of references to [DynClientReg], which spec is now IETF RFC 7591. The normative reference should be updated to point to the final document:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7591
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
--Adrian Gropper MD
Ensure Health Information Privacy. Support Patient Privacy Rights.
http://patientprivacyrights.org/donate-2/
_______________________________________________
WG-UMA mailing list
WG-UMA@kantarainitiative.org
http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-uma