join.me dial-in vs. Kantara "line C" and Skype for our meetings
It was noted on the recent call join.me has grown in functionality since we started using Thomas's paid account, and there is now a dial-in number displayed that we are not using; instead we use Kantara's "line C", which comes with a Skype option. Should we continue splitting up the screenshare and the dial-in (and warn people to try and avoid confusion), which has the advantage of offering the Skype option, or align the two so as to fully avoid any confusion? Please express your opinion here (and Thomas, please let us know if this impacts the costs associated with your account), and we will decide on next week’s call. (Please note the potential confusion when dialing in to the normal number next time!) Eve Eve Maler | cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl | Calendar: xmlgrrl@gmail.com
I use Skype for pretty all of my voice stuff... it seems to work well in the higher latency environment we have here in Australia. -g -----Original Message----- From: wg-uma-bounces@kantarainitiative.org [mailto:wg-uma-bounces@kantarainitiative.org] On Behalf Of Eve Maler Sent: Thursday, 2 July 2015 8:25 PM To: wg-uma@kantarainitiative.org UMA Subject: [WG-UMA] join.me dial-in vs. Kantara "line C" and Skype for our meetings It was noted on the recent call join.me has grown in functionality since we started using Thomas's paid account, and there is now a dial-in number displayed that we are not using; instead we use Kantara's "line C", which comes with a Skype option. Should we continue splitting up the screenshare and the dial-in (and warn people to try and avoid confusion), which has the advantage of offering the Skype option, or align the two so as to fully avoid any confusion? Please express your opinion here (and Thomas, please let us know if this impacts the costs associated with your account), and we will decide on next week’s call. (Please note the potential confusion when dialing in to the normal number next time!) Eve Eve Maler | cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl | Calendar: xmlgrrl@gmail.com _______________________________________________ WG-UMA mailing list WG-UMA@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-uma
Splitting it works for me. -----Original Message----- From: wg-uma-bounces@kantarainitiative.org [mailto:wg-uma-bounces@kantarainitiative.org] On Behalf Of Eve Maler Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 6:25 AM To: wg-uma@kantarainitiative.org UMA Subject: [WG-UMA] join.me dial-in vs. Kantara "line C" and Skype for our meetings It was noted on the recent call join.me has grown in functionality since we started using Thomas's paid account, and there is now a dial-in number displayed that we are not using; instead we use Kantara's "line C", which comes with a Skype option. Should we continue splitting up the screenshare and the dial-in (and warn people to try and avoid confusion), which has the advantage of offering the Skype option, or align the two so as to fully avoid any confusion? Please express your opinion here (and Thomas, please let us know if this impacts the costs associated with your account), and we will decide on next week’s call. (Please note the potential confusion when dialing in to the normal number next time!) Eve Eve Maler | cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl | Calendar: xmlgrrl@gmail.com _______________________________________________ WG-UMA mailing list WG-UMA@kantarainitiative.org http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-uma
participants (3)
-
Eve Maler -
Gil Kirkpatrick -
Salvatore D'Agostino