At 8am PT, at our usual GTM: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/857787301 In our call, I would like to propose a framework, or maybe it's a set of building blocks, for cataloguing different real-world relationships that exercise our "UMA legal party" definitions and tease apart those vs. the "UMA technical entity" definitions, to help us map use cases to them. This exercise is neutral with respect to what type of identity system any one deployment uses; we can get into that level as soon as we see how the use cases (and their "owners" in the real world) fall against the framework. Previous notes are here <https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/UMA+legal+subgroup+notes> and our most recent email thread is here <https://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-uma/2019-May/thread.html>. (I can't seem to find our Google Groups archive; checking into that now.) *Eve Maler*Cell or Signal +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl